swilhelm73
Joined: Oct 06, 2003
|
 Posted:
Oct 08, 2003 - 21:09 |
 
|
So, when looking for a game, I try to find another team within about +/-10 points, both TR AND SR, of my own.
Sometimes though, I see that TR and SR can be rather different. And looking up the SR calculation, it seems more accurate.
So, when looking for games should you really only focus on the SR score? Or should you consider both? |
|
|
Jugular
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 08, 2003 - 21:19 |
|
Its down to personal preference. Instead of asking these questions on the forum try two options first.
1) If its like a yes or no question try the chatroom
2) If ur not satisfied try searching for a related thread.
In the forums history there have been many issues raised in fact a discussion on this particular thing was caried out quite recently.
I answer to ur question I tend to lok at STR most closely but always take into account the TR. |
|
|
BadMrMojo
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 08, 2003 - 21:25 |
|
If you want the most accurate prediction of how a match will go, look at the potential opponent's roster first. You can usually tell whether the team has played a gazillion matches and simply got roughed up or has an overinflated TR due to extra players sitting in the dugout.
Also, you can easily see if the other coach is actually interested in playing ball (ie: takes some actual ball handling skills) or Mordheim with Squares®™ (ie: No skills except block, tackle, MB, PO, Claw, RSC, etc...) and make your decision accordingly.
That said, I am lazy and just usually go by TS. <generalization class="broad">Frequently a low TS/TR ratio is either one or more missing players OR a purely bashing team while a higher TS/TR usually means a more ball-oriented team.</generalization> Just an observation (which will probably be jumped upon as being false). |
_________________
Ta-Ouch! of BloodBowl
Condensed Guide for Newbies |
|
Conceding v Goblins/...
Search
