24 coaches online • Server time: 08:33
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Gnomes are trashgoto Post ramchop takes on the...goto Post Chaos Draft League R...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
BadMrMojo



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 30, 2004 - 16:54 Reply with quote Back to top

GalakStarscraper wrote:
...Adobe doesn't allow for additional text lines to be added so the "or below a value of 1" was impossible to leave above the table. Look at the LRB 2.0 ... that line was the final line of the paragraph there are well....


Actually, you can do it if you're sneaky.
Got pages 41, 60 and even the Gutcruncher error. Cool. Sadly unable to distribute it due to the EULA, as Galak pointed out on TBB.

_________________
Ta-Ouch! of BloodBowl
Condensed Guide for Newbies


Last edited by BadMrMojo on %b %03, %2004 - %16:%May; edited 1 time in total
m0nty



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 30, 2004 - 16:56 Reply with quote Back to top

The font thing annoys me. The 2.0 document has only 10 embedded font subsets whereas 3.0 has 55 - no doubt contributing to the increased file size of the latest file. It's the sort of thing that the new Quark file will fix, via font replacement features.
BadMrMojo



Joined: Aug 02, 2003

Post   Posted: Apr 30, 2004 - 17:09 Reply with quote Back to top

The extra fonts are undoubtedly due to the extra pages for Khemri, Elves and Rotters in addition to the condensed paragraphs. I think it's also because they probably just used the 2.0 LRB as a background image and put new type over top of it, so they have the original ten fonts embedded twice. Should be fixed with a new PDF from a clean Quark prototype.

_________________
Ta-Ouch! of BloodBowl
Condensed Guide for Newbies
Andariel



Joined: Sep 04, 2003

Post   Posted: May 01, 2004 - 20:54 Reply with quote Back to top

Hail to the new rules! WA finally playable again! even scored a TD today with my RO, making a pass to him and blitzing to the TD line (so it was a 2+ roll and not 4+) Very Happy
jokklas



Joined: Jan 07, 2004

Post   Posted: May 03, 2004 - 10:05 Reply with quote Back to top

Yeah, was a BIT annoying to pay for the high MA and AG of the RO when they were pretty much useless earlier Smile
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic