DropDeadFred
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
|
 Posted:
Oct 07, 2004 - 19:44 |
 
|
i really like circus, the fun factor on them, not like stunty is all about winning, they sound well good |
_________________
Sk8bcn is unhappy with my sig so i have changed it to this |
|
celas
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 07, 2004 - 20:12 |
|
I want to vote but there are so many versions of each team on each thread (i.e., 2-3 circus teams proposed on the link) that I am not sure what team I would be voting for. I like the original idea of the beasties but if you read on in the thread, the base players have OFAB and Thrall!?! which seriously changes the team. So if I vote for them what did I vote for?  |
_________________
Northern Wastes League |
|
albator2001
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 07, 2004 - 20:27 |
|
When will you apply star players for all stunty races ???
|
|
|
Tinkywinky
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 07, 2004 - 20:59 |
|
I think star players should be top priority. It's really unfair the way things are now. |
_________________
Do you play ranked and wonder where all the good coaches are? Are you also from Sweden? Then join the Swedish league! |
|
Glomp
Joined: Jan 04, 2004
|
| Posted:
Oct 07, 2004 - 21:57 |
|
Evo's team cant remember what its called but its the most interesting concept for a stunty team I've seen in a while.
If this vote will produce a real fumbbl team its clearly the best option.
Nuff said |
_________________
Forum terrorist. |
|
hunter
Joined: Aug 11, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 08, 2004 - 02:39 |
|
Well, I voted for the Jockeys, since I developed them.  Beyond that, and more importantly in my mind, I was also able to do a bit of playtesting with them. My cursory results are that they are relatively unique, viable, fun, and mayhemful. My concern with many of teams listed is that they seem to be in early developmental stages, and have not been playtested at all in their current forms. Unfortunately, I don't have any time to help out in this regard, although I would very much like to. I have only been able to play one or two games in the last couple of months. 
Anyway, although I voted for Jockeys, I wanted to give input on a couple of others; however, I will be the first to admit that I have not playtested them, so my opinions are solely based on how I anticipate they would turn out:
1) The idea of a stunty skaven team sounds good, but I have yet to see a roster that I really like. I'm honestly not a big fan of the Skyre Slaves, although the core players sound fun. The rest of the team I really don't like too much... reasons include that I don't think any player should have av11, for example. I guess I'm just not sure why that team has generated the most votes so far. I just don't get a "skaven" feel from it, if that makes any sense.
2) The circus team on the other hand (Evo's version) would have my second vote, were I able to give one. It sounds fun, although I think you will need to have a certain level of skill and/or luck to score and survive well with them.
3) The Beasties would have my third vote, although I'm not exactly sure which roster I'd be voting on. I think it needs a bit of fine tuning perhaps, so my vote would be for the developed concept, and not for a specific team at this point.
I could give more opinions on the others, but suffice to say at this point I would not cast a vote for them. I actually do like ALL of the concepts (especially the Jellies... lol), but the team development seems to need more work for most of them.
Just my thoughts, for what they're worth.
~hunter |
|
|
Miyuso
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 25, 2004 - 07:43 |
|
I know it's too late, but i should have posted my Delauro. Too late now, Let me know next time your thinking about something similar. Gives me more time for Play testing. Unless of course, people want them up now.
Brad |
|
|
Chaos Draft League R...
Search
