CorporateSlave3
Joined: Feb 07, 2004
|
  Posted:
Mar 22, 2005 - 19:43 |
|
How about fouling T16 when you've already won?
p.s. is it inevitable that nearly every tactic-based thread ends up being about fouling? It's like the failed apoth of threads I guess:
(1) Topicpothecary has failed! Your Thread is now about Fouling.
|
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Mar 22, 2005 - 20:52 |
|
It´s because lots of people respond with fouling, when they face a tactic they can´t cope with. |
|
|
PhilMan
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Mar 22, 2005 - 21:00 |
|
...or if they just get bored and want to see how many times they can make the opposing coach swear...not that i've ever done that...ahem...*whistles innocently* |
_________________ as a friend once said: 'Willys'
"Best Bar in This Street" |
|
DoubleSkulls
Joined: Oct 05, 2003
|
  Posted:
Mar 23, 2005 - 00:10 |
|
Okay so T16 fouling is petty revenge, and doesn't make the game more enjoyable for either player. I'll slap my own wrists. Don't do it again you naughty boy
However it really was borne from frustration of seeing such a negative approach to the game. I reckon my opponent probably had about a 50/50 chance of getting a winner (he might have not considered the chance so high, but he could theoretically score without GFIs and without leaving the ball carrier unprotected too).
The defeatism that is inherent in such an approach I don't understand. Its a game, not RL.
Its not about the odds of victory or defeat - its about risk/reward ratios. The advantages of winning are greater than the disadvantage of losing (-1 on FF, vs +1 on FF & +1 winnings, also faction games have a 3:1 ratio of scores too) so play should reflect that. |
_________________ Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
Eucalyptus Bowl |
|
keggiemckill
Joined: Oct 07, 2004
|
  Posted:
Mar 29, 2005 - 18:54 |
|
Well put. |
_________________ The Drunker I get, the more I spill
"Keggie is the guy with the bleach blond hair that gives answers nobody else would think of."
Jeffro |
|