44 coaches online • Server time: 15:59
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Secret League Old Wo...goto Post Creating a custom to...goto Post ramchop takes on the...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
ben_awesome



Joined: May 11, 2016

Post   Posted: Sep 14, 2019 - 17:03 Reply with quote Back to top

If you only got a stun they'd still be down on the pitch...
razmus



Joined: Jun 23, 2017

Post   Posted: Sep 14, 2019 - 18:10 Reply with quote Back to top

ben_awesome wrote:
If you only got a stun they'd still be down on the pitch...


Right. So apply the defenders +3 against armor on all the armor rolls against the defender AFTER they've gone down. (Of which there are zero rolls.) Smile
Archpeasant



Joined: Mar 07, 2008

Post   Posted: Sep 14, 2019 - 18:39 Reply with quote Back to top

razmus wrote:
Archpeasant wrote:
Why do you only get +3 when you blitz a chainsaw with a chainsaw?


At a guess... it'd be because you aren't rolling after the defending chainsaw has gone prone. (I.e. As you roll... the chainsaw isn't known to be falling... hence the defending chainsaw isn't helping with the injury. It's only after the chainsaw player is going prone that it's +3 would apply... and that roll is now unnecessary.


While I'm in no way advocating this to be actually implemented, it would make sense for his own chainsaw to come down and give him a second armor roll.
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic