Ehlers
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
|
 Posted:
Apr 13, 2009 - 14:30 |
 
|
| Wreckage wrote: | | anti wrote: | Illegal, how? I genuinely don't know, so don't take this as provocation, and answer the question 
You agree to a matchup, and then buy stars/inducements based on that matchup. How is checking that the team that joined is the same that you agreed to play an illegal feature? |
well it is not what he asked for... he asked to remove the possibility to hire stars sneaky before the game.... that has nothing to do with inducements... they are perfectly fine.... it's just two completly different things..... |
Again please read my whole post and the thread.
It was not only about stars! But I dont have to explain that again do i?
And as Astarael pointed out for me, I was mistaken on when to buy stars. |
|
|
Kalimar
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 13, 2009 - 15:06 |
|
| Emrys wrote: | | Hang on - that's not right. Spiralling Expenses get deducted after the match, reducing your winnings (and your treasury if winnings aren't enough to cover expenses). |
You are absolutely right, of course. Point 3 of the Post-Match-Sequence. So this needs to be reported to Fumbbl by the client when uploading results. The hiring of Journeymen and new players will stay with the Website however. |
|
|
Ouroboros0977
Joined: Feb 01, 2009
|
| Posted:
Apr 13, 2009 - 15:08 |
|
How about they fix the bug that causes players in LRB5 games to block instead of using their chainsaws. Last time I checked they started off with it running not having to start the chainsaw in LRB5. Really ruins a friendly game when a str 2 gobbo blocks instead of chopping the opponent to small pieces with their chainsaw. |
|
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 13, 2009 - 16:05 |
|
| Kalimar wrote: | | SillySod wrote: | | As far as I can see Ehlers is just asking for a stage where you click "yes, these are the teams I agreed to play"... |
This stage already is in the client. You can look at your opponents team (all players) and then answer Yes/No. Teams will be locked at Fumbbl only if both coaches agree to play after looking up their opponent's team. Then inducement phase starts. |
Perfect, ty for the clarification  |
_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
dga01
Joined: Nov 19, 2007
|
| Posted:
Apr 13, 2009 - 17:09 |
|
haven't read the whole thread, but a nice feature I would like is to be able to watch replays with the same client as we use to play with. |
|
|
Kalimar
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 13, 2009 - 18:44 |
|
| dga01 wrote: | | haven't read the whole thread, but a nice feature I would like is to be able to watch replays with the same client as we use to play with. |
Not fully implemented yet, but prepared for. So it will come |
|
|
orko_oskar
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 11:38 |
|
I´d like to see the 2008 rules review as well as the slann, pact and underworld teams implemented.
Also, will the handicap special plays be in? |
|
|
xcver
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 11:59 |
|
| Ouroboros0977 wrote: | | How about they fix the bug that causes players in LRB5 games to block instead of using their chainsaws. Last time I checked they started off with it running not having to start the chainsaw in LRB5. Really ruins a friendly game when a str 2 gobbo blocks instead of chopping the opponent to small pieces with their chainsaw. |
what are you babbling about? We're not talking about the current LRB5 division playing in the old SkiJunkie client... |
_________________
"Power without perception is virtually useless and therefore of no true value!" - Ryouken - Master of the Hokuto no Ken Martial Arts |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 12:49 |
|
mm. babbling
i want singing dancing stripping cheerleaders! |
_________________
 |
|
xcver
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 13:42 |
|
| pythrr wrote: | mm. babbling
i want singing dancing stripping cheerleaders! |
and chilled beverages... |
_________________
"Power without perception is virtually useless and therefore of no true value!" - Ryouken - Master of the Hokuto no Ken Martial Arts |
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 17:30 |
|
| orko_oskar wrote: | I´d like to see the 2008 rules review as well as the slann, pact and underworld teams implemented.
Also, will the handicap special plays be in? |
I'm not sure about the rules review... I'd keep it pure LRB5 until LRB6 is out (which is this october iirc). However, it would be cool to add the Slann and Pact and so on because they are all OKed as an unofficially official part of LRB5. |
_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
Ebenezer
Joined: Feb 11, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 19:09 |
|
Feature: support the superstition.
I wish a button to "shuffle" the dice once a game per player (change the seed) so I can curse Nuffle twice when the luck is against me
Even in real TT (and in NAF tournies) I ask the refree if I can change my dices before I start throwing miniatures all around the room 
Disclaimer: I trust the random generator, I'm only a "little" superstitious  |
|
|
WindexChugger
Joined: Oct 06, 2008
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 22:22 |
|
| Ebenezer wrote: | Feature: support the superstition.
I wish a button to "shuffle" the dice once a game per player (change the seed) so I can curse Nuffle twice when the luck is against me
Even in real TT (and in NAF tournies) I ask the refree if I can change my dices before I start throwing miniatures all around the room
Disclaimer: I trust the random generator, I'm only a "little" superstitious |
While yes, I think this would be a really cool idea...I'm not sure if I like it. What I mean by that is: I'd rather have time spent on making it completely playable and (almost) bug free before little side additions are made. |
|
|
Grod
Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 22:34 |
|
What about for added realism, a feature to "dispute" a dice roll? You know, something like "No, dammit, that dice is lying on the computational floor. Only rolls on the board count. Clearly I must roll again." |
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Apr 14, 2009 - 23:04 |
|
and, and, how about the nuclear option of 'accidentally' smacking the table with your knee and knocking all the figures over so that you can carefully reposition a few since you have "forgotten" exactly where they were..... |
_________________
|
|
|
|
Gnomes are trash
Search
