86 coaches online • Server time: 13:55
Index Search Usergroups Profile
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Improving Gamefindergoto Post Could someone help m...goto Post The Impossible Black...
 
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Smeesh



Joined: Oct 29, 2005

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 10:54 Reply with quote Back to top

I did´t really useit ot take the skill but it seemed so. what i remember is that i had to klick on it befor the block. But if you know better then write how it was exactly.
DukeTyrion



Joined: Feb 18, 2004

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 11:01 Reply with quote Back to top

Smeesh wrote:
I did´t really useit ot take the skill but it seemed so. what i remember is that i had to klick on it befor the block. But if you know better then write how it was exactly.


You certainly had to click PO before blocking in the old client, but was that the rules, or a limitation of the previous client coding?
DukeTyrion



Joined: Feb 18, 2004

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 11:02 Reply with quote Back to top

cbbakke wrote:
koadah wrote:

Are you going to play or are you only here for the claw threads? Wink


Are you just here to look for a fight or did you come to post about the topic? Smile


Maybe koadah is just commenting on someone who has never played on FUMBBL, putting his weight behind rule changes on FUMBBL. Wink
RandomOracle



Joined: Jan 11, 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 11:06 Reply with quote Back to top

DukeTyrion wrote:
Smeesh wrote:
I did´t really useit ot take the skill but it seemed so. what i remember is that i had to klick on it befor the block. But if you know better then write how it was exactly.


You certainly had to click PO before blocking in the old client, but was that the rules, or a limitation of the previous client coding?


I didn't use PO much in LRB 4, but my understanding is that while you had to click PO before the block, the skill would not be used if it was not needed. Thus, the effect is the same as choosing to use it after seeing the result of the armor roll.
Garion



Joined: Aug 19, 2009

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 11:11 Reply with quote Back to top

RandomOracle wrote:
DukeTyrion wrote:
Smeesh wrote:
I did´t really useit ot take the skill but it seemed so. what i remember is that i had to klick on it befor the block. But if you know better then write how it was exactly.


You certainly had to click PO before blocking in the old client, but was that the rules, or a limitation of the previous client coding?


I didn't use PO much in LRB 4, but my understanding is that while you had to click PO before the block, the skill would not be used if it was not needed. Thus, the effect is the same as choosing to use it after seeing the result of the armor roll.


Yar that is correct.

The ski junkie client had it slightly wrong in this case, though the effect was pretty much as intended.

_________________
Unnerf Master chef 2014!!!

In reference to Halflings -
Posted by Roland on 2014-10-10 18:30:05 - Look at garions replays, total magic there!
DukeTyrion



Joined: Feb 18, 2004

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 11:14 Reply with quote Back to top

RandomOracle wrote:
DukeTyrion wrote:
Smeesh wrote:
I did´t really useit ot take the skill but it seemed so. what i remember is that i had to klick on it befor the block. But if you know better then write how it was exactly.


You certainly had to click PO before blocking in the old client, but was that the rules, or a limitation of the previous client coding?


I didn't use PO much in LRB 4, but my understanding is that while you had to click PO before the block, the skill would not be used if it was not needed. Thus, the effect is the same as choosing to use it after seeing the result of the armor roll.


That's correct, if you had already broken armour you would not pile on. I guess the times you might have a different view of things were limited though, for instance after a second frenzy block you might no longer wish to Pile On, but in the old client if you failed to break armour, you still would.
cbbakke



Joined: Sep 22, 2011

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 21:29 Reply with quote Back to top

Which edition did the PO add the players strength to the armor roll?

In the end, I still really like the idea of PO working like a foul or PO person having a chance to injure themselves. Both would be big risk which I think fits with the big reward of piling on imo
RandomOracle



Joined: Jan 11, 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 22:00 Reply with quote Back to top

cbbakke wrote:
Which edition did the PO add the players strength to the armor roll?


LRB 2, I think. If I'm correct, it was changed to an armor reroll in LRB 3.
DukeTyrion



Joined: Feb 18, 2004

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 22:39 Reply with quote Back to top

cbbakke wrote:
Which edition did the PO add the players strength to the armor roll?

In the end, I still really like the idea of PO working like a foul or PO person having a chance to injure themselves. Both would be big risk which I think fits with the big reward of piling on imo


That sounds like Dirty Tackle (also BB2), but if you want to change the rules of Blood Bowl, you are in the wrong place.

If you want to change the rules for FUMBBL, shouldn't you at least play some games here?
cbbakke



Joined: Sep 22, 2011

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 23:25 Reply with quote Back to top

just giving my opinion on a good idea sure gets a lot of heat. I am not trying to change the rules of the FUMBBL just giving my take. I hope to be playing some games this fall though here.
EmperorZombie



Joined: May 17, 2010

Post   Posted: Sep 23, 2011 - 23:47 Reply with quote Back to top

cbbakke wrote:


I like that idea and concept before it. Do you have to declare your wrestling move before you pile on? Smile I want to go with the big elbow Macho man style


yeah, theres the guillotine leg drop, the peoples elbow, get a chair in there and one could possibly Sabu him as well... but that might be more 'stunty' around here.

Rules: you declare a PO on a downed opponent, roll his armor+2 and yours +1, add in fan factor bonus, haha. Let Nuffle sort the rest.
studmandudebro



Joined: Apr 28, 2009

Post   Posted: Sep 24, 2011 - 00:09 Reply with quote Back to top

the counter is dieng then you cant get clawed
cbbakke



Joined: Sep 22, 2011

Post   Posted: Sep 24, 2011 - 00:21 Reply with quote Back to top

I want to do RVD's move where he put the chair on the guys face across the ring and then did a spring drop kick from across the ring. No clue what it was called but damn it looked nasty


EmperorZombie wrote:
cbbakke wrote:


I like that idea and concept before it. Do you have to declare your wrestling move before you pile on? Smile I want to go with the big elbow Macho man style


yeah, theres the guillotine leg drop, the peoples elbow, get a chair in there and one could possibly Sabu him as well... but that might be more 'stunty' around here.

Rules: you declare a PO on a downed opponent, roll his armor+2 and yours +1, add in fan factor bonus, haha. Let Nuffle sort the rest.
EmperorZombie



Joined: May 17, 2010

Post   Posted: Sep 24, 2011 - 00:37 Reply with quote Back to top

cbbakke wrote:
I want to do RVD's move where he put the chair on the guys face across the ring and then did a spring drop kick from across the ring. No clue what it was called but damn it looked nasty


Haha yeah, he would toss a chair at them, they would catch it, and he would spinning jump kick them through it. Good Times
Sabu would get RVD to hold a chair next to the downed victims head, get a running start and slide kick the chair. Tha has Blood Bowl potential...
Ruiner



Joined: Mar 25, 2010

Post   Posted: Sep 24, 2011 - 02:17 Reply with quote Back to top

I like PO as it is.
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 1.2 © 2003 PNphpBB Group
Credits