40 coaches online • Server time: 12:49
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post War Drums?goto Post Conceding v Goblins/...goto Post Advice tabletop tour...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
BillBrasky



Joined: Feb 15, 2005

Post   Posted: Dec 05, 2011 - 21:10 Reply with quote Back to top

Good idea Spinball
uuni



Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 02:01 Reply with quote Back to top

My proposition still is to be more lenient with TV limits. Perhaps the NA crowd could tolerate more inducements in their games in order to get any?

(Best fit does not mean anarchy... jadajada...)
Sutherlands



Joined: Aug 01, 2009

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 02:29 Reply with quote Back to top

That doesn't do anything when there aren't enough coaches.
koadah



Joined: Mar 30, 2005

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 07:16 Reply with quote Back to top

If there really are so few of you then you'll be mainly playing vs the same coaches and same teams anyway.

That is not very Box like.

It's not really the [R] way either.

It sounds as though you ought to be in [L]! Wink

_________________
Image
O[L]C 2016 Swiss! - April ---- All Star Bowl - Teams of Stars - 2 more teams needed
Wreckage



Joined: Aug 15, 2004

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 10:38 Reply with quote Back to top

Haven't ever been to cyanide really but heard legends about two coaches only playing each other being on the top at their equivalent of the box.
Smeesh



Joined: Oct 29, 2005

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 10:42 Reply with quote Back to top

I also donĀ“t think the 4 player rule should be lowered. But the TV rule could so it is likely to schedule as much as possible. Like if there are 2+ coaches left after first scheduler run, scheduling in a second run with the TV rule like currently in ranked.

Greetings

Smeesh
koadah



Joined: Mar 30, 2005

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 11:28 Reply with quote Back to top

Wreckage wrote:
Haven't ever been to cyanide really but heard legends about two coaches only playing each other being on the top at their equivalent of the box.


That doesn't happen in FOL

And at least they can get a game in what for us are the dead hours.

_________________
Image
O[L]C 2016 Swiss! - April ---- All Star Bowl - Teams of Stars - 2 more teams needed
Irgy



Joined: Feb 21, 2007

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 11:55 Reply with quote Back to top

I have a lot of trouble getting [B] games in my normal hours as well. It's painful activating over and over, and frustrating not to find a match. I don't think it's necessarily a small range of different coaches at those times as such, just a small number activating at any given time. The numbers Sutherlands mentions fluctuate, so it's not like it's the same two coaches activating over and over, there appears to be a number of coaches trying and giving up over that stretch of time.

Reducing the minimum number of players seems wrong, but increasing the acceptable TV difference, increasing the time between activations, and accepting only being able to match 2 out of 4 all sound like they could help.
zakatan



Joined: May 17, 2008

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 13:21 Reply with quote Back to top

what about the 2~3 not scheduled coaches joining the gamefinder after a failed round, just pick up any game (throw a dice in fumbbl chat for instance) and will be the same feeling as the box.

_________________
Image
dode74



Joined: Aug 14, 2009

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 15:12 Reply with quote Back to top

Wreckage wrote:
Haven't ever been to cyanide really but heard legends about two coaches only playing each other being on the top at their equivalent of the box.
We look for that and permaban them in FOL. It's happened once on 9 months. Admittedly that't the times I'm aware of, but if I'm not aware of it then they're not near the top of the standings and aren't doing a particularly good job of cheating!
shadow46x2



Joined: Nov 22, 2003

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 15:38 Reply with quote Back to top

you know...i hear there's a division called Ranked that only requires 2 coaches to "activate" to participate in a game....

you should look into it...

--j

_________________
origami wrote:
There is no god but Nuffle, and Shadow is his prophet.

ImageImage
Fela



Joined: Dec 27, 2004

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 15:43 Reply with quote Back to top

Sutherlands wrote:
spinball wrote:
Sutherlands wrote:

"4 coaches activated, not enough possible matches",
'

I would like to see if this happens

A vs B

C and D not scheduled if they are too far apart

So at least 1 game gets scheduled but 4 coaches joined

That would be nice as well.


Last time I paid attention 1 match with 4 activating coaches WAS possible?
Sutherlands



Joined: Aug 01, 2009

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 18:00 Reply with quote Back to top

@fela: no
@shadow: ranked is also pretty empty at those times.
@koadah: I'm already in two leagues
koadah



Joined: Mar 30, 2005

Post   Posted: Dec 06, 2011 - 18:08 Reply with quote Back to top

Sutherlands wrote:
@fela: no
@shadow: ranked is also pretty empty at those times.
@koadah: I'm already in two leagues


That was a joke really. Wink

But still, [L]eague is not just for leagues.

I think Shadow's point is that if no games are scheduled then you shout out "who wants a [R]anked game then". i.e. you only wait another few seconds to play the same coach you would have played anyway.

_________________
Image
O[L]C 2016 Swiss! - April ---- All Star Bowl - Teams of Stars - 2 more teams needed
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic