39 coaches online • Server time: 09:33
Index Search Usergroups Profile
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post ARR Season III: Tsun...goto Post dirty tricks!goto Post Witch legend roll - ...
 
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Poll
Zuper Zstar Zskill 5
+MA
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
+AV
5%
 5%  [ 4 ]
Pro
31%
 31%  [ 23 ]
Tackle
21%
 21%  [ 16 ]
Sidestep
6%
 6%  [ 5 ]
Diving Tackle
17%
 17%  [ 13 ]
Fend
2%
 2%  [ 2 ]
Jump Up
4%
 4%  [ 3 ]
Retire the team, sell my computer and adopt a nomadic existence searching for the one they call Spir0...
8%
 8%  [ 6 ]
Total Votes : 73


Nelphine



Joined: Apr 01, 2011

Post   Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 08:10 Reply with quote Back to top

I like Painstates argument. I would much rather have fend than Diving Tackle.
Grod



Joined: Sep 30, 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post   Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 08:24 Reply with quote Back to top

I clicked tackle ... but Pro is better by far! Here is an example of a successful big guy with Pro:

http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=player&player_id=512412

_________________
I am not young enough to know everything.

Oscar Wilde
On1



Joined: Jul 12, 2004

Post   Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 08:26 Reply with quote Back to top

PainState wrote:

3: Fend does negate PO except for Jugger.
[


Remember grab counters fend as well, in a way Smile

edit: what i mean is, you can still PO someone that has fend, if u have grab, since u can place them next to you (you can in return counter this with sidestep)
Aflo



Joined: Jun 16, 2009

Post   Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 10:48 Reply with quote Back to top

PainState makes a very good case for fend...

Pro is good, I remember being a complete noob on here and my lizard team was *carried* by my block, pro, break tackle kroxigor. It is however boring. So I'm crossing that off.

It's between fend and DT for me. Love DT generally but this guy gets fouled alot and has a worrying propensity to getting cas'ed when he does.

Think I'll go through a couple of replays once I've got a bit more time, see which of the two would have been better.

Cheers for the replies everyone!
stej



Joined: Jan 05, 2009

Post   Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 13:22 Reply with quote Back to top

No love for sidestep? Could be useful for hitting stuff on the sidelines and generally being a pain when marking cages.

I can see the merits of fend here. Fend vs bashers DT vs agility. SS migth be a bit of good against both
the_Sage



Joined: Jan 13, 2011

Post   Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 13:50 Reply with quote Back to top

Taking sidestep when you have stand firm? Sounds like a waste.

Diving tackle doesn't see you fouled as often as piling on does, as it causes a turnover in many cases, allowing you to stand back up (or protect him with others if he lies bonehead)
Even if he does get fouled, he's AV9 thick skull, giving ok odds unless he's swarmed and dp'd.
Aflo



Joined: Jun 16, 2009

Post   Posted: Feb 29, 2012 - 15:49 Reply with quote Back to top

He gets fouled alot as it is and has a peculiar propensity to leaving the pitch as a result (even with a +1/2 armour modifier and thick skull). I've gone with diving tackle in the end so he's a solid road block that I can park in front of cages and say 'deal with it'. We shall see how it pans out...
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 1.2 © 2003 PNphpBB Group
Credits