55 coaches online • Server time: 17:45
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post All Star Bowl!goto Post Secret League Americ...goto Post test mode doesnt wor...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Poll
Should PO be altered so that it only affects AV roll?
Yes!
56%
 56%  [ 26 ]
No!
15%
 15%  [ 7 ]
Blizzard is not the company you are looking for...
28%
 28%  [ 13 ]
Total Votes : 46


On1



Joined: Jul 12, 2004

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 12:48 Reply with quote Back to top

Oh and on a sidenote, I'm rolling a Barb when D3 comes out.
pythrr



Joined: Mar 07, 2006

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 12:51 Reply with quote Back to top

?

what?

_________________
Image
Image
On1



Joined: Jul 12, 2004

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 12:53 Reply with quote Back to top

pythrr wrote:
?

what?


It's very simple. This is a poll... You click "Yes" if you agree piling on should only affect armor rolls... You click "No" if u disagree.

Very VERY simple!
pythrr



Joined: Mar 07, 2006

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 12:55 Reply with quote Back to top

Your "question" is a statement. Are you asking whether Blizzard SHOULD change PO, or are you saying that they have?
On1



Joined: Jul 12, 2004

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 12:57 Reply with quote Back to top

pythrr wrote:
Your "question" is a statement. Are you asking whether Blizzard SHOULD change PO, or are you saying that they have?


"Should PO be altered" <--- it is a question.

I think you are looking at the subject, rather than the elements within it.

edit: Try look at the screen again, above "rolling a barb" and below "Blizzard change PO!" Really take your time here.. Look very closely..! THERE!


Last edited by On1 on %b %05, %2012 - %12:%Mar; edited 1 time in total
Calcium



Joined: Apr 08, 2007

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 12:59 Reply with quote Back to top

WHAT?

_________________
Image
Hitonagashi



Joined: Apr 09, 2006

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:01 Reply with quote Back to top

I think :

a) The general response to this will be yes
b) It's a shocking bad solution and it will only be voted yes because there are no alternatives.

_________________
http://www.calculateyour.tv - an easy way to work out specific team builds.
Image
On1



Joined: Jul 12, 2004

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:01 Reply with quote Back to top

Hitonagashi wrote:
I think :

a) The general response to this will be yes
b) It's a shocking bad solution and it will only be voted yes because there are no alternatives.


I think your response is cool, what do you think would be a better option?
JimmyFantastic



Joined: Feb 06, 2007

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:02 Reply with quote Back to top

Nerf AG4

_________________
Pull down the veil - actively bad for the hobby!
pythrr



Joined: Mar 07, 2006

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:03 Reply with quote Back to top

On1 wrote:
pythrr wrote:
Your "question" is a statement. Are you asking whether Blizzard SHOULD change PO, or are you saying that they have?


"Should PO be altered" <--- it is a question.

I think you are looking at the subject, rather than the elements within it.



Yes, I am. And so is everyone else...
pythrr



Joined: Mar 07, 2006

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:03 Reply with quote Back to top

And why are you denying us PIE?

_________________
Image
Image
On1



Joined: Jul 12, 2004

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:06 Reply with quote Back to top

pythrr wrote:
On1 wrote:
pythrr wrote:
Your "question" is a statement. Are you asking whether Blizzard SHOULD change PO, or are you saying that they have?


"Should PO be altered" <--- it is a question.

I think you are looking at the subject, rather than the elements within it.



Yes, I am. And so is everyone else...


No, only the ones not paying attention to details. You are either very random or a bad troll.

oh and since you have not quoted the edited version... it must have taken you a serious amount of time to reply to my post Razz (these are the details i pay attention to)

Last edited by On1 on Mar 05, 2012 - 12:59; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:03

Like 4 minutes...


Last edited by On1 on %b %05, %2012 - %13:%Mar; edited 1 time in total
Hitonagashi



Joined: Apr 09, 2006

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:09 Reply with quote Back to top

On1 wrote:
Hitonagashi wrote:
I think :

a) The general response to this will be yes
b) It's a shocking bad solution and it will only be voted yes because there are no alternatives.


I think your response is cool, what do you think would be a better option?


Only allow it to reroll injury. PO doesn't need a major nerf...the clawbomb teams don't actually win that many games, unless they are being coached by RandomOracle or Carnis (who get silly win rates with other races too).

I've seen a few proposed fixes to PO, and I also quite like "no modifiers apply to a PO", so if you PO, you can't use claw or MB on the PO roll. Think my favourite is only RR injury though.
Calcium



Joined: Apr 08, 2007

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:13 Reply with quote Back to top

Image

_________________
Image
JimmyFantastic



Joined: Feb 06, 2007

Post   Posted: Mar 05, 2012 - 13:19 Reply with quote Back to top

Hitonagashi wrote:
PO doesn't need a major nerf...the clawbomb teams don't actually win that many games, unless they are being coached by RandomOracle or Carnis


or meeeeeee!

Great point, it's the AG4 teams that have the silly win%, however if GW were still making money from BB they would want the customers to be happy and they are not happy with PO(cos they are pixel hugging babies) but fine with AG4 and Blodge being overpowered(cos they are pixel hugging babies).

_________________
Pull down the veil - actively bad for the hobby!
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic