Gadgetfiend
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Apr 18, 2004 - 13:10 |
 
|
My team has only 11 players so I need to cover myself against injuries. Would I be better off buying an extra player or an apothecary? |
|
|
Michael_Warblade
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 18, 2004 - 13:21 |
|
|
quota
Joined: Nov 24, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 18, 2004 - 13:24 |
|
Without more info I can't really answer for sure. However, in most cases I'd get the apo. |
_________________
the only good undead is a dead, uhm, undead... |
|
origami
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 18, 2004 - 13:49 |
|
The apo would be better in almost every situation. |
|
|
Fejd
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 18, 2004 - 14:31 |
|
With cheap, undeveloped players, buy another. Otherwise, buy the apo.. |
|
|
Faulcon
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 18, 2004 - 14:49 |
|
For ranked or whatever they call it now, apothecary at 50k is going to work out much better over an extended period because for 50k you can save 5 players in 6 games (going on odds) who you would otherwise have to replace. Even if the players are cheap and undeveloped they're still going to keep costing you and never get better if you can't keep them healthy. |
|
|
veron
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 18, 2004 - 15:08 |
|
Yeah, have to second the others here; in almost every case you'd better off getting that lousy, one-rolling Apo. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Gnomes are trash
Search
