Grod
Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
 Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 05:16 |
 
|
Anyone got some good piling on house rules? I think the most official alternative is to allow injury rerolls only.
How about these 2 alternatives instead (they are separate possibilities)?
1. Piling on can only be used on blocks, not blitzes (similar to multiblock).
2. Piling on must be declared and the player placed prone BEFORE any armor rolls is made. The attacking coach then has the right to reroll either the subsequent armor or injury roll if they choose.
What do you think of mine? Do you have a different one? |
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
DrDiscoStu
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 05:30 |
|
i like the idea of the second one
never really thought about house rules... perhaps if the player successfully causes an injury he stuns himself? |
_________________
Check out my fishing and camping blog.
The Black Pearl Bounty-Board.
GUARD CONQUERS ALL! |
|
xnoelx
Joined: Jun 05, 2012
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 05:34 |
|
I don't use house rules, but I always liked the fluffiness of the original version from 3rd edition: PO adds the user's ST to the AV roll. If I remember rightly, it was declared before rolling. |
_________________
 Nerf Ball 2014 |
|
Kam
Joined: Nov 06, 2012
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 05:45 |
|
Make it an Agility skill, and work on fouls.
And suddenly, the flings became scary.  |
_________________
GLN 17 is out!
 |
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 06:14 |
|
| Kam wrote: | Make it an Agility skill, and work on fouls.
And suddenly, the flings became scary. |
The agility idea isnt terrible |
|
|
Stimme
Joined: Jun 30, 2013
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 06:45 |
|
I found the idea interesting that the onpiling player has to roll armor and potentially injury roll, too. Finally a relieve from these murderous killer snotlings. |
|
|
Grod
Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 07:15 |
|
| Stimme wrote: | | I found the idea interesting that the onpiling player has to roll armor and potentially injury roll, too. Finally a relieve from these murderous killer snotlings. |
I like that one. |
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
Rat_Salat
Joined: Apr 22, 2011
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 07:25 |
|
How about just get rid of it altogether?
Easy. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 07:56 |
|
|
Raughri
Joined: Oct 11, 2011
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 08:14 |
|
I remember someone suggesting it is a big guy only skill. I like the that.
My favourites are if you pile on, and roll a double you roll on the injury table, so the piling on player is at least stunned and maybe worse. |
|
|
RC
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 08:16 |
|
how about it never generating more then a ko
Or a PO rrd cas never gives spp.
Cus I hate , hate , hate when a block does not even go through armor. Lucky N00b chooses to po, armor break, injury roll and R.I.P. |
_________________
"Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." |
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 08:29 |
|
PO player is banned if any roll is a double. |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 08:40 |
|
Change its name to pile on. |
_________________
 |
|
azyx
Joined: Jun 28, 2007
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 08:44 |
|
PO only on double roll skill |
|
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 06, 2014 - 08:48 |
|
| azyx wrote: | | PO only on double roll skill |
yes! and bring back traits! |
|
|
|
|
Gnomes are trash
Search
