bardulf
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
May 27, 2004 - 13:22 |
 
|
So in resume it will be better for a starting rooster an idea would be some thing like this:
11 skinks = 660K
1 adept = 90K
2 rr = 120K
1 apoth = 50K
8 FF = 80K
u will loose one rr, but u will win an apoth and more ff. I used that formaula in all skink tourney and it had worked well. |
|
|
Clementus
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 27, 2004 - 13:26 |
|
Av 7 Stunty on front line aint great admittedly, but think of MOST Chaos fling sides. They can either put Two minotaurs on front line, who only have av 8, FAR more expensive. Or they can put 3 flings, who are even more fragile. Tbh most stunty sides put Stunties on the front line to save their Big Guys.
THere is still the thought of giving them one Saurus (bodyguard of Adept) or another big guy, Salamander etc. Evo had already shown his ideas for one so would be interesting. Two daggers I think would be detrimental, taking ssps from the others even more. |
_________________
Warlord Clementus (of the Black Hand Tribe)
Monkey of the Moot!
Flings Rule! |
|
Dooby
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 27, 2004 - 14:47 |
|
hehe nice one Clem. Give em a big guy to stop the whinging!
Give em Godzilla 4 8 1 11 Multi Block, Guard, Mighty Blow, Prehensile Tail, Claw
Not sure about the laser beams, maybe give him Hypnotic Gaze as well. Lets not make it too steep cos skinks are expensive maybe 30K what do you reckon  |
|
|
Stovaa
Joined: Apr 22, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 27, 2004 - 15:40 |
|
|
bardulf
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 27, 2004 - 16:57 |
|
| Quote: |
Give em Godzilla 4 8 1 11 Multi Block, Guard, Mighty Blow, Prehensile Tail, Claw
|
u forgot WA, and RSC ... jejeje ... not realistic, but what about something like this:
skink shaman 6 2 3 8 dodge (a position player with out stunty and 8 of armour could be good)
or
skink dungeon beast 3 4 1 8 WA,Frenzy,MB (.. may be little insane) |
|
|
Uber
Joined: Mar 22, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 02, 2004 - 11:02 |
|
Here's a suggestion:
0-1 Krox
0-1 Adept
0-4 Skink
0-12 Skinklings 6 2 3 6 Dodge, Stunty - Ag
11 ma8 guys is unbalanced, AV7 is considered high for stunty, let's cut on what actually is the problem. |
_________________
Recovering FUMBBL addict. |
|
Clementus
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jun 02, 2004 - 11:17 |
|
Its their fluff, the speediness. Not exactly a problem but cutting out all the problems, or their fluff really, means making the teams too similar. The whole idea of skinks is that they are elite stunties, darn fast and relatively hard. |
_________________
Warlord Clementus (of the Black Hand Tribe)
Monkey of the Moot!
Flings Rule! |
|
Uber
Joined: Mar 22, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 02, 2004 - 11:39 |
|
The skinklings idea is that the good skinks usually play on lizardmen teams, and the slower and softer have to play stunty leeg. They are limited in "good" skinks because the turnover rate in the big league is so high that they just can't supply enough! My proposal would make the team somewhat similar to the strigs. A bunch of linefodders, who are still pretty fast for stunties, a decent big guy and four standard skinks who are arguably as good as the vamplings. (+2MA = gen+str access, right stuff & ofab?) Oh and they have the adept too. Just food for thoughts. |
_________________
Recovering FUMBBL addict. |
|
Dooby
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jun 02, 2004 - 12:47 |
|
I think new skinks should really be play tested before they are looked at in any further depth. I feel at high TR, about 5 games in judging by most skink rosters, they are going to get buried. More than most they will require good rolls on skills to prevent a downward spiral of injuries/deaths and not enough cash to replace them. |
|
|
LordSigmund
Joined: Jan 28, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 02, 2004 - 13:26 |
|
i like the skinkling idea, but i absolutely hate the trend of putting 'ling' at the end of normal players to make a small version, this is stunty, think up some original names |
|
|
Dooby
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jun 02, 2004 - 23:08 |
|
What you frelling talkling aboutling. Puttling ling at the endling of everyling is coo...ling |
|
|
ChrisB
Joined: Nov 28, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jun 02, 2004 - 23:28 |
|
One saurus isnt too bad as you can take them down with str 2, but 2 makes it very difficult if you use them together. For me a single saurus would help... |
|
|
|
|
All Star Bowl!
Search
