WingedHuman
Joined: Aug 24, 2007
|
 Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 06:05 |
 
|
So in a match, my ball and chain guy moved onto the ball... since he has no-hands he causes it to scatter from his square, the scattering doesn't ever land on any of my guys, and I never have a chance to pick up the ball. But this causes me to turnover the ball to my opponent.
Why?
TIA |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 06:10 |
|
link the replay? |
_________________
 |
|
WingedHuman
Joined: Aug 24, 2007
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 06:11 |
|
@pythrr I'm currently IG I'll add the link once game is complete. It's a league game and we're at the end of our round, so I don't want to stall it any longer then It should be |
_________________
 |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 06:26 |
|
ah
ok |
_________________
|
|
Kryten
Joined: Sep 02, 2003
|
It's a turnover because picking up the ball is mandatory, failing to pick the ball up is a turnover, and no-hands means that you automatically fail any pick up attempts. |
|
|
WingedHuman
Joined: Aug 24, 2007
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 06:46 |
|
|
the_Sage
Joined: Jan 13, 2011
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 07:51 |
|
When this happened to me I was also convinced it must be a bug... now I'm convinced it's a bad rule instead. |
_________________
Content: Twitch / Youtube ; Updates: Facebook / Twitter
(because big banners are compensating) |
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 08:13 |
|
Yup, pretty bad rule....
BC player fails pickup because he has no hands... Doh! |
|
|
tussock
Joined: May 29, 2011
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 08:30 |
|
People used to exploit the B&C to repeatedly scatter the ball until someone caught it, or at least get it out of a tight spot. There is a bug where pushing one of your own prone players onto the ball with the B&C is a turnover (sometimes, may depend where it scatters).
Never need to move them onto the ball once you know. |
_________________
  |
|
Badoek
Joined: May 17, 2009
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 10:47 |
|
exploit? sounds like a fun way to play! |
_________________
 |
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 11:16 |
|
| Badoek wrote: | | exploit? sounds like a fun way to play! |
Yeah, i mean it's not like the cpomb exploit  |
|
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 12:06 |
|
I would love to see a match with 10 fanatics and 1 normal goblin per side, where the goblin is only allowed to pickup the ball if it has already been scattered into the end zone
Wouldn't work with the current pickup fail rule though  |
|
|
WhatBall
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 12:58 |
|
It is a bad rule. One I fixed in my cathartic rule rewrite. It is a particularily shitty rule for Stunty. |
_________________
 |
|
PaddyMick
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 13:31 |
|
@WingedHuman: If you are a ball and chain fan - play snots in stunty, get 2 ball and chain players who can pick up the ball, and don't automatically get sent off at the edn of the drive. |
|
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Nov 07, 2015 - 13:39 |
|
| PaddyMick wrote: | | @WingedHuman: If you are a ball and chain fan - play snots in stunty, get 2 ball and chain players who can pick up the ball, and don't automatically get sent off at the edn of the drive. |
Yeah, wagons can actually pick up  |
|
|
|
|
Conceding v Goblins/...
Search
