Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Apr 22, 2017 - 18:59 |
 
|
| koadah wrote: |
| Matthueycamo wrote: | A version where multiple groups could be selected would be ace like for CIBBL BIBBL.
Either way I tried it out last night and works really great how it is now! |
Comma dlim list should do it. 
Can we link straight in with the ids on the querystring? |
You mean just combining tournaments from different groups by hand? Sorry, won't work. The API requires the corresponding group to the tournaments as parameter. Don't really know why, as the tournamentIds seem to unique on global scope, but that's the way the API is built.
I will think about someting. |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2017 - 20:18 |
|
| Candlejack wrote: | | koadah wrote: |
| Matthueycamo wrote: | A version where multiple groups could be selected would be ace like for CIBBL BIBBL.
Either way I tried it out last night and works really great how it is now! |
Comma dlim list should do it.
Can we link straight in with the ids on the querystring? |
You mean just combining tournaments from different groups by hand? Sorry, won't work. The API requires the corresponding group to the tournaments as parameter. Don't really know why, as the tournamentIds seem to unique on global scope, but that's the way the API is built.
I will think about someting. |
No. Not as clever as that.
'Just' a list of groups. So, all the tournaments in those groups.  |
_________________
O[L]C 2016 Swiss! - April ---- All Star Bowl - Teams of Stars - 2 more teams needed |
|
Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2017 - 20:31 |
|
Well, so far that does not work. And it is a bit tricky as for the second step you have to know which tournament came from which group. |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2017 - 20:55 |
|
|
Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2017 - 22:04 |
|
Since a few minutes a new version is live. You can now enter multiple groupids in the form field.
Since I had to reshuffle a few things in the parameter handling I switched from GET to POST. Meaning that you cannot just create one freaking huge link to bookmark.
I know that this will result in some moaning, but the amount of paramters being passed now makes it the only sensible solution. |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2017 - 22:43 |
|
Ok, to avoid a s***storm, I just now pushed another update live. Now there is a bookmarkable api call of the form of /tournamentPerformances?groupIds=<list of groupId>
Meaning now you can create a bookmarkable link that will always generate the current total stats of all given groups combined. May god have mercy on us...
On a more serious note, in the meanwhile I got more confident about the stability of the tool and it seems that the parall processing within the tool works in the expected limits and should not stress the FUMBBL website too much.
I still encourage you all to use the "Copy bbcode feature" instead of recalculating the stats everytime again. |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
Throweck
Joined: Feb 23, 2013
|
| Posted:
Apr 22, 2017 - 23:38 |
|
|
Matthueycamo
Joined: May 16, 2014
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 01:57 |
|
Is it being worked on right now? Just tried to search and it came back with error no group ids present. |
_________________
DLE College 7s |
|
Matthueycamo
Joined: May 16, 2014
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 02:02 |
|
|
Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 02:14 |
|
Well, that link should not have been generated since the last version was released. Looks like your browser might have used an old cached version. So I would recommend clearing your browser cache. If you use the website it should not generate an GET requests at all anymore but use POSTs instead.
Anyway, I just now pushed a shiny new version, now it also supports to create stats for teams in a group not just tournaments. There is also a new API call available for that, so you could go and bookmark that. Note that the matches calculation takes significantly longer as there are more matches to process and more requests generated.
This required some reworking of the code, so far everything seems to work fine, but I might have borken something.
So now I just have to wait for you to come up with more freakishly abnormal feature requests *glares at kodah* |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 03:30 |
|
|
Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 11:12 |
|
Just had a look into for the last 30 minutes or so. The problem is that processing all the matches for all the teams just takes longer than heroku allows the request to take. I tied some optimizations but to no avail.
So i think there are the following options:
- try a bigger dyno that _might_ process it in time, but no guarantee it does and it would require monthly payments, which i am currently not up to
- rewrite the code (maybe even in another language) hoping to improve the peformance enough, might give it a try sometime in the future but not now
- try hosting it on another provider, this might impose other limitations, it might work to run it on the fumbbl servers but I will not pester christer about it, as he has enough to do already
So yeah, currently it seems that really huge groups will not be able to use that feature. You could try splitting those groups and then combine the resulting bbcode tables manually. |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 11:39 |
|
|
Sharkrudi
Joined: Dec 19, 2011
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 12:02 |
|
Hi, Would it be possible to have the same tables but for teams instead of players in the future. |
_________________
 |
|
Candlejack
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 23, 2017 - 12:25 |
|
Would that really have much benefit? Touchdowns and Cas can be seen on tournament/team pages. Are other stats like rushing/passing really that useful on a team level?
The issue is, that due to the fact how the data has to be aggregated such an evaluation would have to be placed on top of the current algorithm, meaning that it would take even longer to calculate.
I don't think this makes sense as long as we are stuck with the heroku limits. |
_________________
--
The Sanity Resort |
|
|
|
Having issues launch...
Search
