Fudge
Joined: Sep 29, 2003
|
 Posted:
Aug 02, 2004 - 16:59 |
 
|
|
stargzrrag
Joined: Jun 10, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 02, 2004 - 19:47 |
|
The doubles is frustrating at fisrt sometimes...but in the long run apothocary willing eventually you can get normal skills for your guys or gals soon.
http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=team&op=view&team_id=90715
9 doubles or stats in 16 games.
Funny how Dark Elves seem to be the ones everyone is sharing  |
|
|
DS
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 03, 2004 - 11:28 |
|
Stat increases are great my old st5 witch elf was great before he got killed ,
the normal skills will follow then youll have a great team |
|
|
Jinxed
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 03, 2004 - 11:40 |
|
Withc Elf? ST5?
he? got killed?
So many steroids she grew a pair?  |
|
|
hugoeng
Joined: Dec 14, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 03, 2004 - 11:44 |
|
Well I just got an AG+ as first skill with an Dark Elf Lineman. And took pass block instead. Stupid maybe, but IMO the team benefit more from block/dodge/pass block., etc than AG+. He wont be a scorer/blitzer because of the low MA and I already have a thrower.. A blitzer or witch is of course a totally different matter as AG+ would help them in their respective roles. |
|
|
Flaymin
Joined: Jan 09, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 03, 2004 - 12:07 |
|
|
DS
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 03, 2004 - 16:02 |
|
|
vanGorn
Joined: Feb 24, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2004 - 22:45 |
|
Once I rolled a 11 for a saurus which had -ma. I took block without much hesitation. With the reduced speed he won't develop to a great blitzer, but is a prefered guy for the LOS. |
|
|
Jinxed
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 04, 2004 - 23:20 |
|
+AG is useless for AG1 players, even mostly for AG2 players unless they are fast enough. (Like Bull Centaurs!) |
|
|
MixX
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 05, 2004 - 00:28 |
|
| Quote: | | +AG is useless for AG1 players, even mostly for AG2 players unless they are fast enough. (Like Bull Centaurs!) |
depends on the team I'd say, I have a Dwarf team where both Troll Slayers have gotten +AG, it gives the team much greater mobility and a lot better tactical flexibility, since I can actually Dodge him away if he's pinned down or when I need him to move to get that damn blodge catcher off the field... |
|
|
bigdog
Joined: Mar 06, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 05, 2004 - 15:50 |
|
I very first skill on my very first team was AG+ on a Mino. I took it like a dummy. I regretted it always. |
|
|
Morgion
Joined: Jul 19, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 05, 2004 - 16:22 |
|
that minus -av.. must b a bit of a concern if he gets hit hard badmojo |
_________________
 |
|
BadMrMojo
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 05, 2004 - 16:57 |
|
| Morgion wrote: | | that minus -av.. must b a bit of a concern if he gets hit hard badmojo |
Yeah, that was just picked up last game. I generally use him as a passer or middleman in the long field play, so he doesn't get hit too much, usually.
I worry whenever anyone gets hit, however. AV has nothing to do with it. Check out the CAS against my dwarves to see what I mean. |
_________________
Ta-Ouch! of BloodBowl
Condensed Guide for Newbies |
|
Glomp
Joined: Jan 04, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 05, 2004 - 17:49 |
|
People seem to have missed the point of this (slightly) jokey forum.
I have no doubt that in the long run the doubles and extra stats will help me win games, as evidenced by the past two results for them (both wins).
My concern was that in the early stages of a teams development (especially, humans and darkelves) too many doubles could cost you games since you lack the cohesiveness that these 'average' teams rely upon.
Essentially the question has now changed to 'can I put the early losses down to my great/terrible skill rolls - or do I just suck?' |
|
|
quota
Joined: Nov 24, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 06, 2004 - 08:22 |
|
| inquisitorpustus wrote: | My concern was that in the early stages of a teams development (especially, humans and darkelves) too many doubles could cost you games since you lack the cohesiveness that these 'average' teams rely upon.
Essentially the question has now changed to 'can I put the early losses down to my great/terrible skill rolls - or do I just suck?' |
I still disagree with you, I don't think stat rolls suck, not at first and not later on. I usually don't go for the free reroll skills either, you have team rerolls for that sort of thing. So get more rerolls... darnit  I can understand why you'd miss skills like guard, tackle, block for the linemen, and so on, but I doubt that alone will be enough to cost you the game. |
_________________
the only good undead is a dead, uhm, undead... |
|
|
|
Elf Draft Coach
Search
