Rasfahan
Joined: Feb 26, 2004
|
 Posted:
Feb 20, 2005 - 12:04 |
 
|
Hello, everyone,
I would like to know if you want to stay with the current 3-week-schedule (1 week to declare matchups, 2 weeks to play games) or if we should move to a 2-week schedule (4 days to declare matchups, 10 days to play games).
It seems games are progressing rather quickly, so I'ld suggest the latter. |
_________________
Stable League Revival
Group Page
Group Thread |
|
Arcon
Joined: Mar 01, 2004
|
| Posted:
Feb 20, 2005 - 12:13 |
|
Just my opinion.
With six stables now, the work is not that much, and a shorter shedule keeps the league more interesting. |
|
|
sk8bcn
Joined: Apr 13, 2004
|
| Posted:
Feb 20, 2005 - 13:03 |
|
I am for a 3 week schedule. You will see that a 14 days schedule is far too short, considering Mully's Eurocrown tournament and keeping it in time will be tough.
But that's my opinion. |
|
|
Waldbaer
Joined: Mar 01, 2004
|
| Posted:
Feb 21, 2005 - 14:31 |
|
three weeks, me too...could be too fast otherwise. I guess, if everything works fine, we can shorten the playtime each round by hand if necessary |
_________________
---> this mail is sponsored by woodcraft, the one and only <--- |
|
FUMBBL HAIKU'S
Search
