Woodpecker
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
|
 Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 17:54 |
 
|
Well? Hurry up with the decision please.  |
|
|
Karhumies
Joined: Oct 17, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 18:05 |
|
I am not a member of the group but I'd like to remind that "injury" in Blood Bowl refers to stun, KO or CASualty. If all stunned players need to retire, what team lives after the second match?
If you meant all CASsed players should retire, then BH and SI players should both retire. I don't think BH'd players should retire in any case.
If you meant all players who have got a permanent injury should be retired...then your question is just wrong. It says "injured", not "permanently injured". |
_________________
Main Organiser of
Grudge [L]eague, #GrudgeLeague @ irc.fumbbl.com
and Stunty Spinoff Series, #GrudgeLeague |
|
Macavity
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 18:06 |
|
Hah!!!! I voted and I'm not in the tourney!!! I crack me up!! Khemri suck!!!! |
_________________
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. -C.S. Lewis |
|
Macavity
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 18:13 |
|
to Karhumies: He may have meant injured as in "possessing of an injury", in which case only SI would qualify as other injuries do not last long enough for retirement to be an option (never show up on team listing) this would apply to MNG as well as permanent injuries, thus being a missed option in your list  (and the correct interpretation since I'm always right!) |
_________________
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. -C.S. Lewis |
|
Aconite
Joined: Jun 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 18:41 |
|
This refers to any player who must miss a game for whatever reason in the Last Man STanding tournament
(I think) |
_________________
Dejected, he hangs up the phone. "Air Holes. Remember the air holes", the online pet store owner mutters while slapping his forehead.
(Brad Osberg) |
|
R_Spiskit
Joined: Nov 24, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 19:02 |
|
No, I think injured players should stay. You can field beaten up men
If you get to the final, and it's 1 man each, and 1 niggles, TOUGH!!
It is the LAST MAN STANDING tourny after all. |
|
|
Macavity
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 19:07 |
|
I personally feel that the votes of those of us who are not in the tourney should count for more as we are not coloured by personal feelings or silly "point of the tourney" understandings. |
_________________
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. -C.S. Lewis |
|
Aconite
Joined: Jun 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 19:09 |
|
I disagree. If they've missed a match already, what right do they have to still take part in the competition? They've sat out some of the action and have no right to hold such a trophy.
It's LAST MAN STANDING indeed, and they've already shown they can't make the grade... |
_________________
Dejected, he hangs up the phone. "Air Holes. Remember the air holes", the online pet store owner mutters while slapping his forehead.
(Brad Osberg) |
|
President
Joined: Mar 23, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 19:12 |
|
I can;t believe how people are voting.....
The original rules were this anyway, so you might as well just implement it no matter what some wimps who are scared of getting their team hurt think. |
|
|
Aconite
Joined: Jun 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 19:20 |
|
remember there's votes from people outside of the league too, so they may just think it's a silly question rather than based on an individual tournaments rules.
I'd say the actual votes from people in our tournament are 3 for, 1 against!  |
_________________
Dejected, he hangs up the phone. "Air Holes. Remember the air holes", the online pet store owner mutters while slapping his forehead.
(Brad Osberg) |
|
Reventlov
Joined: Aug 14, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 19:26 |
|
Well I voted no for obvious reasons.
The most important reason is:
It's not good to change rules after tournament has started, people might drop out.....
Can a skaven team beat up my dwarves so can anybody.... |
|
|
Woodpecker
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 19:34 |
|
That was never a rule, actually. Just an idea for one that was never followed up. What the poll says will decide. |
|
|
President
Joined: Mar 23, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 20:36 |
|
Maybe i'll just be stupid and retire any of many players who get injured anyway. would make it more interesting for me!  |
|
|
Sziro
Joined: May 07, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 20:56 |
|
Noo! Never!
If we retire all injured players then it will be a perfect rooster of less than 11 players.
Even I think we should not allow a retirement at all. It is the game till death, till the last man. It is the time of -av, -st, -ag, -ma, n, n, n linemans hwo stay on the filed no matter what |
|
|
Woodpecker
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jun 14, 2005 - 21:12 |
|
Tehe. I like that actually. Although I don't see why anyone would retire players, as they ain't coming back or getting replaced.
Okay, so it's decided, the rules stay the same as they are now. |
|
|
|
|
Gnomes are trash
Search
