58 coaches online • Server time: 20:46
* * * Did you know? The fouliest player is Maurizio Compagnoni XVI with 897 fouls.
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Problem with loading...goto Post Super League season ...goto Post New Skill: Onside Ki...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic View next topic
Poll
Should old teams be migrated to the new ruleset?
It's fine, let people have their old teams.
31%
 31%  [ 41 ]
I would prefer clean slate, brand new teams only.
56%
 56%  [ 73 ]
I have a nuanced opinion that I will expand upon in a message.
2%
 2%  [ 3 ]
This option is for MerryZ to select.
9%
 9%  [ 12 ]
Total Votes : 129


koadah



Joined: Mar 30, 2005

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 10:48 Reply with quote Back to top

CrisisChris wrote:
...
Maybe it is an option to create a specific League group with the BB2020 ruleset and allow a transfer into that before forcing a re-draft.
...


You don't need to force a redraft. Standard Fumbbl [L]eague doesn't even have redraft.

You could transfer teams as they are and let them migrate/redraft as fits the league that they want to join.

Assuming that [L]eague teams are able to migrate.

_________________
Image
Secret League rosters, old style skill progression, no re-draft OR full 2016 rules. OR... 4000k All Stars! 21st Anniversary Bowl - Coming March!
Sp00keh



Joined: Dec 06, 2011

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 10:50 Reply with quote Back to top

Binning all old teams is silly and destructive. The ruleset isn't that much of a change.
There's some teams that existed 20 years ago (!) that are still playable in [C], which I think is very impressive the site has supported migrations all this time, why should we break that now?




1) Force the teams into redraft process
Maybe give everyone a budget of 1350k to avoid punishing teams who've not played enough in current season to keep their players

2) Force them to fit into new restrictions during redraft. So can keep 2 blitzers, can't keep 4 blitzers
This means you can keep old teams, but without significant grandfathering abuse



3) For the skills, it'd mean all Skaven Blitzers for example now gain +MA and Strip Ball

If one of them already was Legend.. not sure, don't want to see a 7-skill player. Maybe that's the (tiny) grandfathering issue we have to accept to enable migration
If one of them already had Strip Ball, or +MA+MA then not sure, maybe refund the SPP
Garion



Joined: Aug 19, 2009

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 10:57 Reply with quote Back to top

Sp00keh wrote:

If one of them already was Legend.. not sure, don't want to see a 7-skill player. Maybe that's the (tiny) grandfathering issue we have to accept to enable migration
If one of them already had Strip Ball, or +MA+MA then not sure, maybe refund the SPP


couldn't they just be declared an illegal player and forced to sell during redraft? personally I'd rather that than have illegal players running about

_________________
Image

Image
Sp00keh



Joined: Dec 06, 2011

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 11:14 Reply with quote Back to top

Sure, that'd be an option
CrisisChris



Joined: Dec 11, 2023

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 12:44 Reply with quote Back to top

But why would you pusnish the Skaven Blitzer that who gets+Ma and Strip Ball? Any other player who has several starting skills can still get 6 Skill ups. So as long as the stats do not exceed the max values there is no issue, is there?

I guess it is more the other way around. What if a Wood Elf Catcher already has Sprint as a skill up and now gets it for free? SPP refund? How many SPP?

I am not an expert in all this and I do not know if there are many skills like SneakyGit that work differently in season2 and season3. Does that have an Impact?

As I said I like my teams and I would love to see them play on but I also See the benefits to start from scratch and make tournaments more interesting for those that did not yet have the time to play hundreds of games to develop teams.
MattDakka



Joined: Oct 09, 2007

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 13:27 Reply with quote Back to top

I'd prefer not to have illegal players with more skills than they should have or more positionals than the allowed ones, but my main concern for BB2025 is the Season length.
15-game Season is clearly too long.
With D6 MVP and stuff like Brawlin'Brutes players are going to develop faster.
For a higher balance it's better if stat freaks take longer to be built, so I hope that the BB2025 Season will be shorter than 15 games.
Solaris



Joined: May 29, 2023

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 13:36 Reply with quote Back to top

illegal player are a No Go! Didn't expect they will come. There are a lot of better solutions.

_________________
Image
Urrghs



Joined: Dec 23, 2007

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 13:41 Reply with quote Back to top

Redraft with 2025 restrictions + banning illegal players would be the cleanest option, and most probably the easiest to implement. I hope Christer will go for it.
ThierryM



Joined: Mar 27, 2015

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 17:21 Reply with quote Back to top

"15-game Season is clearly too long" - MattDakka
We can also play all our games with fresh 1000k teams, no progression and basta.
Peak Blood Bowl at its blandest.

_________________
Breeder of Bony Legends !
Image
JanMattys



Joined: Feb 29, 2004

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 17:35 Reply with quote Back to top

I am still salty that my old famous human team didn't get the chance to migrate from LRB to bb2016.
There, I said it.

_________________
Image
MattDakka



Joined: Oct 09, 2007

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 17:41 Reply with quote Back to top

ThierryM wrote:
"15-game Season is clearly too long" - MattDakka
We can also play all our games with fresh 1000k teams, no progression and basta.
Peak Blood Bowl at its blandest.

For that there are NAF tournaments already.
I want some progression, but not too much, otherwise stat freaks have a big impact on the games.
The level up system, as it is, makes building stat freaks too easy and sure.
In case you didn't notice it, the monster Vampire teams often seen in tournaments are so developed thanks to the Season set at 15 games. With a shorter Season those Vampire teams would be less developed.
Rijssiej



Joined: Jan 04, 2005

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 19:22 Reply with quote Back to top

I like the flavor grandfathered teams add to game. I don't think there is a need to force redraft. Only things that are needed is to adjust the base player, remove illegal/double skills and update the value of existing skills.
Chingis



Joined: Jul 09, 2007

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 20:07 Reply with quote Back to top

MattDakka wrote:
I want some progression, but not too much, otherwise stat freaks have a big impact on the games.


The later games of the season are exactly when you are most likely to face a team that is best placed to simply target and murder any kind of "eggs in one basket" freak players on an unbalanced team, removing them from the playing environment. You will be facing more developed teams with higher TV and more skills on average in the last games of the season, and also the TV differentials will be greater.

Those are exactly the games you remove from the schedule by shortening seasons.
MattDakka



Joined: Oct 09, 2007

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 20:14 Reply with quote Back to top

I play a lot in the Box, I see freaks often and they survive for many games despite facing developed teams later in the Season.
The reason is that ball carrier stat freaks are hard to hit, thanks to their stats they can stay back and act as safeties on offence (but avoiding the full brunt of the offence blocks), on their offensive drive they hide in a cage or just are screened, then they can score from almost the middle of the pitch.
So, I don't count on attrition to remove the freaks (which were a common thing even when Cpomb was rampant, and Cpomb was the most effective removal combo), I prefer a radical approach by shortening the Season. It's even more effective with cherrypicking.
It's easy to keep alive and build a freak by playing vs noobs all times, while you can't avoid the Season Re-Draft with the cherrypicking.
Sure, there is Season Re-Draft even now, but at 15 games it's not effective enough at trimming the freaks.
dynamo380



Joined: Apr 05, 2009

Post   Posted: Feb 11, 2026 - 20:29 Reply with quote Back to top

MattDakka wrote:
I'd like to keep all my teams if possible, even if I have to reset them and keep just their names. A forced Re-Draft to all BB2020 teams migrating to BB2025 ruleset (even if they have not ended their Season yet) sounds ok to me.


For what little its worth, this is very much what I would like to see happen. There are teams that I would like to keep, even if its just their name and 'history' (so to speak). Would have no problem redrafting to match the new ruleset
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic View next topic