JimmyFantastic
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
|
 Posted:
Apr 16, 2026 - 23:15 |
 
|
| CrisisChris wrote: | | Rules question: Can fumblerooski cancel stalling? Normally is you Stall and get hit by a stone it is a turnover, because the Ballcarrier loses the ball... BUT, what If the ballcarrier places the ball with fumblerooski before getting Hit from this stone? IMO this would Not cause a turnover and another player may pick up the ball... And in that case stalling would not be triggered because at the beginning of his activation He does not have the ball... Am I right here? |
You can use Fumblerooski this way, but you have to declare a pass or hand off action. Simply ending the turn without the ball is not enough, so if you declare a move action and then fumblerooski, you will be stalling. |
|
|
CrisisChris
Joined: Dec 11, 2023
|
| Posted:
Apr 16, 2026 - 23:49 |
|
| JimmyFantastic wrote: | | CrisisChris wrote: | | Rules question: Can fumblerooski cancel stalling? Normally is you Stall and get hit by a stone it is a turnover, because the Ballcarrier loses the ball... BUT, what If the ballcarrier places the ball with fumblerooski before getting Hit from this stone? IMO this would Not cause a turnover and another player may pick up the ball... And in that case stalling would not be triggered because at the beginning of his activation He does not have the ball... Am I right here? |
You can use Fumblerooski this way, but you have to declare a pass or hand off action. Simply ending the turn without the ball is not enough, so if you declare a move action and then fumblerooski, you will be stalling. |
Ok you will be stalling... which will cost you the 10k extra, but the main thing was: Is there any stone thrown and if so, is it causing a turn over? And if I understood Sp00keyh correct: There would be no TO |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Apr 17, 2026 - 08:58 |
|
| CrisisChris wrote: | | JimmyFantastic wrote: | | CrisisChris wrote: | | Rules question: Can fumblerooski cancel stalling? Normally is you Stall and get hit by a stone it is a turnover, because the Ballcarrier loses the ball... BUT, what If the ballcarrier places the ball with fumblerooski before getting Hit from this stone? IMO this would Not cause a turnover and another player may pick up the ball... And in that case stalling would not be triggered because at the beginning of his activation He does not have the ball... Am I right here? |
You can use Fumblerooski this way, but you have to declare a pass or hand off action. Simply ending the turn without the ball is not enough, so if you declare a move action and then fumblerooski, you will be stalling. |
Ok you will be stalling... which will cost you the 10k extra, but the main thing was: Is there any stone thrown and if so, is it causing a turn over? And if I understood Sp00keyh correct: There would be no TO |
I'm not sure I get you?
In order to avoid stalling this way you must declare either pass or hand off then during that action use fumblerooski to place the ball on the ground.
If you just use move action and fumblerooski, then stalling triggers still.
This ^ is RAW not sure if christer house ruled fumblerooski so it didn't need the extra action declared.
But why would you ever do this anyway? |
_________________
 |
|
sorry BPCalgary
Search
