mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
 Posted:
Jun 18, 2016 - 19:00 |
 
|
|
awambawamb
Joined: Feb 17, 2008
|
| Posted:
Jun 18, 2016 - 21:50 |
|
giüda crÃn ampestà patelavache früstacadreghe fagnan na scarogna vatlupiéntelcû a l'a propij fame giré j chitarin ma da bun né, a s'lu ciap a na tirerja un-a ca lu fas girè per na sman-a pej na sótula vardte bin ne, ssà barchi |
_________________
"la virtù sta nel cielo e nella terra, ma anche nelle nuvole e nelle stelle"
 |
|
Pyror
Joined: Sep 20, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jul 27, 2016 - 15:23 |
|
LINERAT RAGE!!!1
I give you, the effing laziest Linerat I have ever seen, which yet seems to get all the attention. He is basically Blood Bowl's Daniel Sturridge - good talent, doing nothing special, still getting all the praise.
https://fumbbl.com/p/player?player_id=11236299
17 games, 5 MVP titles. On a linerat. That's all. |
|
|
Balle2000
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
|
| Posted:
Aug 28, 2016 - 23:45 |
|
|
Gibsie
Joined: Jul 01, 2016
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 12:32 |
|
I had a nice annoying game last night, and feeling hard done by, I looked at the dice stats to see if it was as bad as I thought. No, not really (although 3 out of 4 Bloodlusts on turn 1, plus two blitzes for my opponent clouded my vision)!
Real neat thing though, my opponent rolled 51 single dice. Of those 51 dice, he rolled a single 3. What are the odds?! |
|
|
Gozer_the_Gozerian
Joined: May 30, 2015
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 13:08 |
|
Your pain is delicious.
P.S. JESUS WEPT! |
_________________
Choose the form of your destroyer. |
|
knightsweats
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 15:21 |
|
| Gibsie wrote: | | Of those 51 dice, he rolled a single 3. What are the odds?! |
0.00093 |
|
|
Nightbird
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 18:11 |
|
| knightsweats wrote: | | Gibsie wrote: | | Of those 51 dice, he rolled a single 3. What are the odds?! |
0.00093 |
And that'll do it!  |
_________________
"If most of us remain ignorant of ourselves, it's because self-knowledge is painful
& we prefer the pleasures of illusion." ~Aldous Huxley |
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 18:28 |
|
well, i HATE it when my opponent doesn't roll many 3s.
damn heathens! |
_________________
 |
|
tmoila
Joined: Nov 25, 2012
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 18:43 |
|
| knightsweats wrote: | | Gibsie wrote: | | Of those 51 dice, he rolled a single 3. What are the odds?! |
0.00093 |
How come I get 0,000018?
(1/6) * (5/6)^50 |
|
|
knightsweats
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 19:22 |
|
| tmoila wrote: | | knightsweats wrote: | | Gibsie wrote: | | Of those 51 dice, he rolled a single 3. What are the odds?! |
0.00093 |
How come I get 0,000018?
(1/6) * (5/6)^50 |
Your odds are just the odds of one three and fifty not threes. You need to allow for the permutations.
The 3 could be first, or second, or third, etc
In this case, because it's just one item, you need to multiply by n, 51, to get 0.0009 |
|
|
tmoila
Joined: Nov 25, 2012
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 22:59 |
|
| knightsweats wrote: | | tmoila wrote: | | knightsweats wrote: | | Gibsie wrote: | | Of those 51 dice, he rolled a single 3. What are the odds?! |
0.00093 |
How come I get 0,000018?
(1/6) * (5/6)^50 |
Your odds are just the odds of one three and fifty not threes. You need to allow for the permutations.
The 3 could be first, or second, or third, etc
In this case, because it's just one item, you need to multiply by n, 51, to get 0.0009 |
Ah, very correct! 51 chances to get the single 3. Thanks! |
|
|
Harad
Joined: May 11, 2014
|
| Posted:
Sep 12, 2016 - 23:53 |
|
To go full geek I would argue that the probability should actually be of rolling any result (1,2,3,4,5,6) only once in 51 attempts. I don't think it is important to the observer which result it is; they would have made the comment whichever result had only come up once. |
|
|
m0gw41
Joined: Jun 12, 2012
|
| Posted:
Sep 13, 2016 - 10:44 |
|
What are the chances of a thread full of rage turning into cold, boring discussion about probabilities?
It's too hard to work out, screw you maths! |
_________________
 |
|
knightsweats
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
|
| Posted:
Sep 13, 2016 - 14:24 |
|
| Harad wrote: | | To go full geek I would argue that the probability should actually be of rolling any result (1,2,3,4,5,6) only once in 51 attempts. I don't think it is important to the observer which result it is; they would have made the comment whichever result had only come up once. |
I had considered that but a wise old maths teacher once told me, "answer the question that's asked."
The answer to your question, meanwhile, is six times greater. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Elf Draft Coach
Search
