tibbo
Joined: Aug 09, 2014
|
 Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 01:33 |
 
|
Are teams permitted to resign player who are not hurt to keep playing low tv rating teams?
kinda irritating playing mb / claw teams who have purposely removed free players from its team too keep a low tv rating .. |
|
|
uzkulak
Joined: Mar 30, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 01:39 |
|
|
Endzone
Joined: Apr 01, 2008
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 01:43 |
|
Don't say the words 'min-max' or 'clawpomb' or we'll get 50 pages. Oops. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 01:45 |
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 01:48 |
|
| tibbo wrote: | Are teams permitted to resign player who are not hurt to keep playing low tv rating teams?
kinda irritating playing mb / claw teams who have purposely removed free players from its team too keep a low tv rating .. |
They are permitted to do so but everyone knows everyone knows that person gives bad Bloodbowl. |
|
|
tibbo
Joined: Aug 09, 2014
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 02:08 |
|
koadah its the same thing for most of the ranked games for me. You'd be suprised at what comes out of the woodwork when people see "rookie " lol and well i suffered a death , used apoth , 2 bh wardancers, had most of my team surrounded by st 4 mb players.. didnt see the point in continueing as it was only turn 3 or 4. i could have continued the game i admit, but truthfully my opponent would have buffed his already punchy team very easily. Didnt fancy letting him kill my players just to delete them from his roster. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 07:14 |
|
|
pythrr
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 07:52 |
|
minmax!~!
yes, is very legal. lame, but legal
but you are not allowed to do so if it takes you below 11 players, m'kay. |
_________________
 |
|
Bobs
Joined: Feb 26, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 08:11 |
|
Sacking healthy players - Lame
Min/max - Lame
Concessions - Lamer
Disable the concession button and disallow sacking healthy players.
More funz |
_________________
si non modo numquam pragmaticam
 |
|
Roland
Joined: May 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 08:44 |
|
I think DOTP league don't allow retirements |
|
|
Fingard
Joined: Oct 07, 2008
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 09:24 |
|
Are you talking about your last match?
Your opponent only retired unskilled rotters.
Maybe you think Nurgle should always play 15/16 players because of Nurgle's Rot?
Anyway, I always retire a player when I think it's not worth its TV... I don't really care if it's injured or not.
Here is the algorithm
for each player:
IF it helps me to win THEN keep
ELSE fire
Easy |
|
|
gjopie
Joined: Oct 27, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 11:53 |
|
| tibbo wrote: | | koadah its the same thing for most of the ranked games for me. You'd be suprised at what comes out of the woodwork when people see "rookie " lol and well i suffered a death , used apoth , 2 bh wardancers, had most of my team surrounded by st 4 mb players.. didnt see the point in continueing as it was only turn 3 or 4. i could have continued the game i admit, but truthfully my opponent would have buffed his already punchy team very easily. Didnt fancy letting him kill my players just to delete them from his roster. |
Hmmm...not sure that is quite true....
Stunty concessions are the lowest of the low! |
_________________
  |
|
tibbo
Joined: Aug 09, 2014
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 14:10 |
|
| gjopie wrote: |
Hmmm...not sure that is quite true....
Stunty concessions are the lowest of the low! |
lol way to bring up the past. i gave stunty a go. didnt enjoy it , dont think i've played it since. Don't see how that is relevant. |
|
|
pubstar
Joined: Jun 13, 2009
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 14:14 |
|
| Roland wrote: | | I think DOTP league don't allow retirements |
Hey hey hey! I love DOTP, and I'm all for recruitment, but don't send whiners our way. I'm the whiniest DOTP coach right now, and it's important for it to stay that way! |
_________________
DOTP!
3DB Highlander!
Fill the Box Grid! |
|
Kam
Joined: Nov 06, 2012
|
| Posted:
Jun 05, 2015 - 14:30 |
|
| tibbo wrote: | | gjopie wrote: |
Hmmm...not sure that is quite true....
Stunty concessions are the lowest of the low! |
lol way to bring up the past. i gave stunty a go. didnt enjoy it , dont think i've played it since. Don't see how that is relevant. |
You're all wrong! Conceding against Stunties is worst.  |
_________________
GLN 17 is out!
 |
|
|
|
Conceding v Goblins/...
Search
