61 coaches online • Server time: 14:31
* * * Did you know? The most deaths in a single match is 8.
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post NBFL Season 24: Wint...goto Post NCBB Season 35goto Post Human League Premier...
JackassRampant
Last seen 58 minutes ago
Human
Legend
Human
Record
283/131/120
Win Percentage
65%
Orc
Super Star
Orc
Record
109/45/60
Win Percentage
61%
Overall
[R]
Legend
Overall
Record
733/275/315
Win Percentage
66%
Archive

2020

2020-09-15 16:46:13
rating 4.5
2020-09-11 04:42:53
rating 5.5
2020-08-17 18:43:44
rating 4.1
2020-08-17 18:37:25
rating 4.6
2020-08-17 18:08:41
rating 4.3
2020-08-17 17:54:03
rating 4
2020-02-26 04:54:58
rating 4.6
2020-02-25 17:53:07
rating 4.4
2020-02-22 18:18:59
rating 4.8
2020-02-22 17:32:27
rating 5
2020-02-19 18:01:17
rating 5.8
2020-02-18 21:21:00
rating 5.9

2019

2019-12-29 14:51:03
rating 5.2
2019-12-08 03:14:34
rating 5.9
2019-10-23 18:17:17
rating 5.3
2019-09-30 19:39:21
rating 5.7
2019-02-28 16:21:11
rating 5.8
2019-02-16 05:05:46
rating 1.8
2019-02-12 20:33:16
rating 1.7
2019-02-07 08:57:24
rating 1.3
2019-02-06 17:07:28
rating 2.6
2019-01-05 20:10:51
rating 5.6

2018

2017

2017-12-13 15:36:46
rating 5
2017-10-15 02:50:34
rating 4.3
2017-09-30 21:52:56
rating 5
2017-09-10 23:00:16
rating 4.9
2017-08-30 19:29:39
rating 6
2017-06-25 21:10:09
rating 5.4
2017-02-14 20:41:13
rating 4.6
2017-02-09 04:15:51
rating 4.3
2017-02-01 16:35:03
rating 3.5
2017-01-09 06:48:33
rating 5.8
2017-01-03 22:26:31
rating 2.8

2016

2016-10-26 16:39:39
rating 5.9
2016-10-06 01:38:35
rating 5.5
2016-07-02 01:18:38
rating 4.3
2016-06-28 18:54:58
rating 3.5
2016-01-28 08:12:39
rating 4.6
2016-01-27 18:15:53
rating 6

2015

2015-08-22 17:42:52
rating 2.4
2015-01-26 16:45:18
rating 5

2014

2014-10-01 03:51:24
rating 4.4
2014-03-14 17:58:34
rating 5
2014-03-12 19:49:16
rating 4.2
2014-02-27 02:15:42
rating 4.3

2013

2013-10-24 16:16:38
rating 4.5
2013-10-16 05:15:52
rating 4.9
2013-10-14 23:39:13
rating 4.8
2013-10-10 00:50:25
rating 4.1
2013-09-24 01:51:44
rating 4.2
2013-09-13 21:36:27
rating 4.2
2013-09-12 20:11:38
rating 5.9
2013-05-16 21:39:45
rating 2.1
2013-03-02 19:45:11
rating 3.9
2013-02-10 21:10:12
rating 4
2013-01-18 06:45:04
rating 4.2

2012

2012-10-30 21:01:49
rating 2.3
2012-10-18 17:10:07
rating 1.6
2012-08-26 17:16:17
rating 2.3
2012-01-09 00:47:16
rating 2.8

2011

2011-12-09 19:37:22
rating 3.3
2011-11-09 17:54:17
rating 4
2011-11-05 20:10:25
rating 4.8
2011-11-04 20:59:28
rating 3.9
2011-11-04 16:39:57
rating 4.6
2011-11-03 05:19:08
rating 2.2
2011-09-21 09:08:03
rating 3.2
2011-08-14 14:51:08
rating 3.8
2019-02-07 08:57:24
18 votes, rating 1.3
Tilt is in the Details (short)
If you think you should participate, without an explicit argument for why, understand that this is your tilt response telling you, "dude, just let go, I got this." This realization is itself a supporting claim for the big bold stuff.

Definition of Tilt: take two
Tilt is when you are playing by your subconscious game with its own ruleset achieved at accomplishing objectives for the ego, and those objectives are dependent on not letting the conscious mind screw them up with noise based on the fallacy that the three brain parts are operating on.

The above definition presents a deductively sound affirmative test for Pantheism.

By inference, mere acceptance of the words "logic" and "randomizer" as being words that imply concepts that exist is a valid check.

I'm not stupid enough to entertain anything in the comments. In fact, just to filter out all the noise, I will simply ignore whatever anyone says, and just look at who the commenters are, so we can talk about this in a PM thread and not worry about noise.

Oh, and downvoting this post is a confirmation of the highest order.

As a check, if you try to stymie the conversation of others, out of your earshot, and you do so in a way that acknowledges it happened, but is anonymous, is it possible that you're trying to ask us not to gossip about you behind your back? But the conversation isn't about you ... unless it is, because you already know that I'm right and are just trying to help yourself come around. If you have any reaction to this at all, please know that the tilt in me sees the tilt in you and this is all you really need.

Now, I'm not claiming this is dispositive ... unless you realize that modal arguments for proving the existence of God are fungible, but look at this way of seeing a 1-vote, try to figure out how to craft a reply, and then test the whole exercise against the idea that your self-sabotage is actually an effort to acknowledge your complete agreement.

* A 1 vote must be a tilt response if there are tilt responses, and a tilt response is actually an understanding that all "strength" is simply a version of a valid argument, which acknowledges a randomizer mechanism, and also acknowledges that all randomizers will do.

* This means that a valid framework for symbolic logic, with any randomizer, presents an argument from an inherently valid framework, but any and all randomizer-based arguments are also not sound, unless the randomizer is a perfect representation of all possibility.

* So we have an accurate validity test for an inductive claim. This itself is a fairly strong reinforcement, but I'm gonna approach it after I get up.

* Moreover, the "1-6" voting system, and the downvoting mechanics by Christer are a tilt response on his part aimed at elucidating the divine mandate for FUMBBL, in a nonprofit form as Christer has structured it. A vote of "1" is an attempt to stifle conversation. Please demonstrate how this could not be a confirmation, but be ready to be honest about all of this.

* 1 isn't just a confirmation. It is actually the most powerful confirmation there is. Because all of the other votes are devoid of both the "stymie as agreement" imply something else, if taken on their own, but 1 is shorthand in fractional notation for "everything" and in fact, used as a stand-in for "Logos."

I'll leave it off there.
Rate this entry
Comments
Posted by Christer on 2019-02-07 11:13:11
I voted 1.

"divine mandate for FUMBBL". Seriously?

You've posted two massive blogs about a topic that mostly everyone understands pretty much intuitively, and you're writing it in a way that obviously tries to make people feel dumb and uneducated.

I challenge you to write your inevitable third blog post in a way that people are able to understand without having to decipher it. Keep it clear and concise. Writing an essay is sometimes easier than writing a paragraph.
Posted by Rawlf on 2019-02-07 12:56:24
9 votes, straight 1. Clearly 'confirmation of the highest order'. Trump of the year.

Maybe just go for a walk outside for a change. Find back to planet earth.
Posted by Sweep12121 on 2019-02-07 14:12:54
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Tilt
Posted by Arktoris on 2019-02-07 16:23:56
pseudo-intellectual blog of the year candidate.
Posted by Carlo_Pellegatti on 2019-02-07 17:06:17
Is it the short version? Good Nuffle, I'm scared about checking the other one, but i'm not sure i will resist xD
Posted by Arktoris on 2019-02-07 18:23:33
The short version actually came from PurpleChest

"Tilt is the poker phenomenon of playing poorly due to emotional distress"
Posted by HandyKaufman on 2019-02-08 05:52:45
I didn't vote in the last blog and I won't vote in this one.

But I will add to the noise. They're MY DICE and you CAN'T PLAY WITH THEM!

Having said that, I have found through my complaining that it breaks down into two different kinds of tilts... (by the way I agree with purplechest that "tilt" is a poker term and can be narrowed by the fact that in poker the two most important poker "plays" are #1 cash out #2 fold... but the poker beast is certainly no the same as nuffl)


having played a lifetimes worth of both games I do have to say another thing that absolutely distinguishes one as superior to the other. In one of the two games I have seen a social atmosphere that compels one to play and in the other a social atmosphere that is dominated by sophomoric egoism. I'll bravely let the community decipher where the chips fall on this one...
Posted by HandyKaufman on 2019-02-08 05:54:57
pardon the multisyllabic tone...
Posted by HandyKaufman on 2019-02-08 05:58:18
math is an uncountable noun... there is no such thing as "maths"
Posted by koadah on 2019-02-08 09:25:41
I guess there must be no such thing as "yours".

Does "mathematic" mean the same thing as "mathematics"?