Melmoth
Joined: May 05, 2004
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:12 |
|
Break tackle (but only if you are lucky enough to roll some STR increase) |
|
|
Webbe
Joined: Aug 13, 2003
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:13 |
|
Where's the poll?
I'd take block. |
|
|
celas
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:13 |
|
Crysist: take the +ST. There are very few times when you would not take +ST. Perhaps we could use this thread to provide examples of when you woudl ever reject +ST. Here's mine: When you have a gutter runner with dauntless already, you *may* turn down +ST to take horns. |
_________________ Northern Wastes League |
|
f0rd
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:17 |
|
block |
_________________ Chuck Norris can divide by zero. |
|
Dooby
Joined: Nov 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:31 |
|
Don't even start threads for stat increases dude, especially +STR. Just pick it and be done - the stat increase that is and not your nose |
|
|
spiderswebb11
Joined: Jul 27, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:40 |
|
I'm dying for some +st on some players. So if you don't take it I'll cry. Do you want that you heartless person? |
|
|
MasterAl
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:42 |
|
You could make an argument on why you would take a skill over a +MA, you could possibly even find a skill that is stragtegically more important to you than a +AG, but there is NOTHING a Ghoul can take that would be better than a +ST and even if there was....the fact that you only get +ST on the roll of a double six, you should take +ST anyway, just for the novelty. |
|
|
Buur
Joined: Apr 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:49 |
|
if you dont want the +st give it to me!
-Buur |
_________________
For most people, reason is nothing but their own believes. |
|
Meech
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:56 |
|
Buur, has anyone told you that your Smurf looks like it is in desperate need of a laxative?
(Take whatever you want.) |
_________________ Putting the FU in fumbbl since 9/2005 |
|
OverDose
Joined: Apr 07, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:58 |
|
Optihut wrote: | ...but since my strategic advice is scorned around here (go for block sidestep and not block dodge first, try to score with Sauri, never put tackle on a witch elf, etc.)... | Then what would you pick when a Block Witch Elf gets two advances on a row: first doubles and then a normal skill roll?
Always take the +ST. |
Last edited by OverDose on %b %24, %2006 - %19:%May; edited 1 time in total |
|
Buur
Joined: Apr 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 18:59 |
|
@Meech Yes that's why he is so angry that he will bite anyone on the tail if they are with in reach!
-Buur |
_________________
For most people, reason is nothing but their own believes. |
|
SnakeSanders
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 19:12 |
|
|
Optihut
Joined: Dec 16, 2004
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 19:25 |
|
OverDose wrote: | Optihut wrote: | ...but since my strategic advice is scorned around here (go for block sidestep and not block dodge first, try to score with Sauri, never put tackle on a witch elf, etc.)... | Then what would you pick when a Block Witch Elf gets two advances on a row: first doubles and then a normal skill roll?
Always take the +ST. |
First Double goes to dauntless, the normal roll would go to sidestep. A lot of people on fumbbl use their witches to inflict casualties, so I can see why the mighty blow on doubles and tackle for the normal roll would be useful. My witches are reserved for crowd pushing, though, so I specifically do not want dodgers to go down - they are supposed to meet the fans |
|
|
Frankenstein
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 19:27 |
|
Besides, all those idiots who are always suggesting Break Tackle whenever someone asks for a skill advice deserve to be shot.
It wasn't even funny the first time. |
|
|
sehou
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 24, 2006 - 19:37 |
|
go for Leader man. It's underrated. |
|
|
|