pac
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 18:25 |
|
treborius wrote: | ...i did expect something below 150 'cause i've been loosing a lot, especially with my ogres, but what i really don't understand is how i got a BBR of 146.18 - i've been playing Ogres about 75% of the time and they 'got a cas-difference of +84 (at 78 games)
anyone got a clue? |
I don't know for sure, but it may generate BBR by comparing the coach's record against the expected rate for that roster. So, while causing lots of CAS with Ogres, you may still have been behind the expected CAS rate for Ogres. |
|
|
treborius
Joined: Apr 05, 2008
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 18:32 |
|
pac wrote: | treborius wrote: | ...i did expect something below 150 'cause i've been loosing a lot, especially with my ogres, but what i really don't understand is how i got a BBR of 146.18 - i've been playing Ogres about 75% of the time and they 'got a cas-difference of +84 (at 78 games)
anyone got a clue? |
I don't know for sure, but it may generate BBR by comparing the coach's record against the expected rate for that roster. So, while causing lots of CAS with Ogres, you may still have been behind the expected CAS rate for Ogres. |
ah, yes - i remember reading something like that elsewhere - that makes a lot of sense |
|
|
westerner
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 19:24 |
|
treborius wrote: | ...my BWR is really low at 139.95, though
anyone got a clue? |
Sub-140 CR's are very rare in [R] so there is something strange about this number.
Your overall [B] record is -8 TD's over 119 games, pretty close to even. Which doesn't jive with a BWR of 140.
I think it's the handicaps you're giving away that are hurting you because of the way ranking is calculated. Lithuran also posted about this. |
_________________ \x/es |
|
Shivkala
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 20:18 |
|
Wow, I'm on position 53684, didn't realize there were that many coaches on fumbbl (quick check: Total 53983 coaches)... Seems like I have a first real goal in B - get above BWR 150 to make a jump of > 50000 places in one go
As for the racial distribution, it would be really interesting to see the distribution with the teams played in the last week or two as I personally feel that there is a shift from Khemri/Chaos/Ogre towards more Elfs... (Still lots of Orcs, though) |
|
|
sk8bcn
Joined: Apr 13, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 20:23 |
|
|
westerner
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 20:27 |
|
Neat!
Shivkala, I suspect there are a very large number of coaches at the 150 mark (all the fumbbl coaches who haven't played [B]).
I"m #153. Goal: crack the top 50. |
_________________ \x/es
Last edited by westerner on %b %23, %2009 - %20:%Feb; edited 1 time in total |
|
funnyfingers
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 20:28 |
|
treborius - You are losing a lot of matches where you are higher in TS, and any that you win look like you are also higher in TS. The few that I've seen where you have a lower TS are ties. I think the wide difference in TR/TS is giving you a huge disadvantage. |
|
|
TheCetusProject
Joined: May 25, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 20:28 |
|
The amount of rating information shown on that page is at a good level, I hope there isn't anything else added. I like not being able to see the BR of anyone else. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 20:34 |
|
|
treborius
Joined: Apr 05, 2008
|
  Posted:
Feb 23, 2009 - 23:07 |
|
funnyfingers wrote: | treborius - You are losing a lot of matches where you are higher in TS, and any that you win look like you are also higher in TS. The few that I've seen where you have a lower TS are ties. I think the wide difference in TR/TS is giving you a huge disadvantage. |
yep, i suppose when i play my ogres i give away at least 2 HCs on avg. - probably the BWR doesn't take into account 5 TS per HC, so for the BWR-updating formula i'm playing down at least 10 TS on avg. each game... |
|
|
daberserker
Joined: Jun 24, 2004
|
  Posted:
Feb 24, 2009 - 10:58 |
|
Just a question...
Why do the 4 first matches doesn't count? I mean they are for real too, say you win your first four and lose the 5th one then you get a negative ratio despite 80% win?
Personally I love vanilla BB... |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Feb 24, 2009 - 11:52 |
|
In order to combat people that just use teams that are extremely strong the first few games and then retire and repeat. |
|
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
  Posted:
Feb 24, 2009 - 11:54 |
|
Eg starting a team with 3 stars hired, win game 1, retire, repeat. |
|
|
DonTomaso
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
|
  Posted:
Feb 24, 2009 - 11:57 |
|
Nice...
Good to see a few coaches with high rating and low bashing... (unless I'm misinterpreting the chart)...
Jaim, for instance...
Good going! |
_________________ ====================================
Be careful, my common sense is tingling! |
|
Tinkywinky
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
|
  Posted:
Feb 24, 2009 - 13:42 |
|
clarkin wrote: | Eg starting a team with 3 stars hired, win game 1, retire, repeat. |
If you do that in B you will get a TS of 150 or so and meet opponents with the same ts. The above mentioned tactic works in rookie smacks because you are facing other tr 100 teams. I don't see why that should affect B. |
_________________ Do you play ranked and wonder where all the good coaches are? Are you also from Sweden? Then join the Swedish league! |
|
|