DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
  Posted:
May 26, 2010 - 12:53 |
|
JanMattys wrote: |
I agree.
One of the factors of the Blackbox matching is the ranking of the coach. Having an inactive coach taken out of the rankings after a while is ok, slowly dropping his rank is not. |
BBR is no longer used is the team-matching formula.
That said, I still hate decay, in any form. Hiding inactive coaches seems to be a good way forward though. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 26, 2010 - 14:04 |
|
My thoughts. Mostly already covered by others.
1. Monthly ranking. Like Championship but meaningful.
2. List All coaches BWR not just top 10.
3. Option to filter BWR list by All (everyone), Current (people who have played in the last n days), All time (coaches highest ever BWR)
4. If someone has not played in n months their CR/BWR cannot be above x (e.g. 170). i.e. You can't just play one game and go straight back to the top of the list.
5. Allow [B] teams to play in [R] Majors. |
_________________
O[L]C 2016 Swiss! - 19th June! ---- All Star Bowl XII - Teams of Stars - Sign up NOW! |
|
PurpleChest
Joined: Oct 25, 2003
|
It's all the same, only the names will change
Everyday it seems we're wasting away
Another place where the faces are so cold
I'd drive all night just to get back home
I'm a cowboy, on a steel horse I ride
I'm wanted dead or alive
Wanted dead or alive
http://fumbbl.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=17784
Stick with it, because Christer responds. |
_________________ Barbarus hic ego sum, quia non intelligor illis -Ovid
I am a barbarian here because i am not understood by anyone |
|