koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Dec 29, 2012 - 15:17 |
|
Hi Coaches,
The Black Box Sprint ends on New Years Eve.
There is still a little time left to steal a racial title.
Currently DEs, WEs and vampires lead the table with the top humans 12th.
The Junior Sprint currently contains quite a few low TV teams. Some people seem to feel that some of the lower TV teams have bit of an easy life compared to those slogging it out higher up.
It has been suggested that the Junior Sprint should have a lower limit. What do people think?
If there is a limit what should it be? 1300? 1400? 1500?
Low TV results could still count towards the Conference.
Post you opinions here.
|
_________________
O[L]C 2016 Swiss! - 19th June! ---- All Star Bowl XII - Teams of Stars - Sign up NOW! |
|
Overhamsteren
Joined: May 27, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 29, 2012 - 17:10 |
|
Even though the average TV exposes their shameful truth I suppose minimum 1400 for junior sprint and minimum 1300 for conference would be ok.
Although of course other teams min/max very well for 1400 too, at least they don't prey on the real fresh teams. |
_________________ Like a Tiger Defying the Laws of Gravity
Thanks to the BBRC for all the great work you did. |
|
happygrue
Joined: Oct 15, 2010
|
  Posted:
Dec 29, 2012 - 18:47 |
|
Overhamsteren wrote: | Even though the average TV exposes their shameful truth I suppose minimum 1400 for junior sprint and minimum 1300 for conference would be ok.
Although of course other teams min/max very well for 1400 too, at least they don't prey on the real fresh teams. |
+1 |
|
|
werks
Joined: Dec 09, 2012
|
  Posted:
Dec 29, 2012 - 20:01 |
|
Min/maxing @ fumbbl, YOU DON'T SAY!! |
|
|
Nelphine
Joined: Apr 01, 2011
|
  Posted:
Dec 29, 2012 - 21:35 |
|
erm werks, most of the people here are advocates of trying to help with that issue, which is why a minimum value being placed onto the junior sprint and conference seems like a very good idea to me. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 02:16 |
|
|
Topper
Joined: Aug 03, 2003
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 02:21 |
|
Hmm just one small thing to add though - very few stunty teams will compete then.
They have a hard time getting past 1400 -and stay at least a tad competitive.
Apart from that I think allĀ“s good |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 02:44 |
|
|
Overhamsteren
Joined: May 27, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 03:21 |
|
Yeah stunties need to count all games!
Ogres, goblins, halflings not lizards and underworld? |
_________________ Like a Tiger Defying the Laws of Gravity
Thanks to the BBRC for all the great work you did. |
|
blader4411
Joined: Oct 18, 2009
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 03:43 |
|
Definitely not Lizards &, UW, and they can have obscene win rates at low TV. Maybe Vamps? |
|
|
Overhamsteren
Joined: May 27, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 04:50 |
|
Wouldn't vamps benefit from not counting their sub 1400k matches? |
_________________ Like a Tiger Defying the Laws of Gravity
Thanks to the BBRC for all the great work you did. |
|
uuni
Joined: Mar 12, 2010
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 16:36 |
|
Could we then add an additional category to small TV teams? Under 1200k?
Some people like to play low TV. Amazons and Norse thrive there for example, also Humans and Orcs. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
  Posted:
Dec 31, 2012 - 22:19 |
|
|
uuni
Joined: Mar 12, 2010
|
  Posted:
Jan 01, 2013 - 01:14 |
|
Well could we then have a category for very high TV, like over 2M? Grand Prize?
I would like to see more matches over 2300k TV.
Personally, I would like to widen the played TV from current 1200k-1700k grind. |
|
|
Igvy
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
|
  Posted:
Jan 01, 2013 - 01:45 |
|
Games against team that are playing their first game; should not count. |
|
|
|