dode74
Joined: Aug 14, 2009
|
  Posted:
Jul 31, 2015 - 14:31 |
|
arry wrote: | Next silly question! Didn't feel the need to open a new thread as it's related.
Code: |
! . .
. p X .
. G p !
A . .
|
G has Grab, is pushed to player X. Can X then be pushed to the exclamation marks?
Here's what the venerable rulebook has to say on the matter.
Quote: | This
secondary push back is treated exactly like a normal push back
as if the second player had been blocked by the first |
A literal-minded person would interpret this to mean that yeah, the pushed Grabber could choose the additional squares. A thinking person would consider that silly. | A literal-minded person would likely point out the difference between a block and a Block Action and not ask the "silly question", realizing that G has not taken a Block Action and therefore cannot use Grab |
|
|
mister__joshua
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
|
dode74 wrote: | mister__joshua wrote: | Taking just this bit:
Quote: | This secondary push back is treated exactly like a normal push back
as if the second player had been blocked by the first |
...there could be an argument that the pushed player (your opponent) decides where player X gets pushed to. This would negate all chainpushing etc. | Only if you ignore the very next sentence in the rulebook:Quote: | The coach of the moving team decides all push back directions for secondary push backs unless the pushed player has a skill that overrides this. | Context |
Hehe. Well, yeah, there is that.
I hadn't checked the rules, just the quote |
|
|
PaddyMick
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
|
  Posted:
Jul 31, 2015 - 18:06 |
|
Angmarred wrote: | PaddyMick wrote: | Take moar grab = be less annoyed at elves
But really it's for S access only players as 3rd or 4th normal, or a legend skill on GS access.
Would be fun to do a Grab Spam team though. |
They're called Simyins |
5 players don't make a spam! ;p |
|
|