CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 02, 2008 - 16:56 |
|
Last time we just did a standard-KO-tourney and filled it up in regard to:
- Matches won
- TD dif in the last match
- cas dif in the last match
- TD scored
- cas scored
- cointoss
But we can also run a KO -tourney and play out the losers brackets. |
|
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
  Posted:
Apr 02, 2008 - 17:00 |
|
As long as theres a system i dont mind. Would be fun to find out whos the losiest leser though and the KO - thing keepse people more involved (more satisfying to my type of person than TD difference too).
Just depends what feel you're going for. |
_________________ Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
BiggieB
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 02, 2008 - 17:18 |
|
Ill give it a spin, orcs plz |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 02, 2008 - 19:18 |
|
KO tourney with losers brackets sounds just fine.
Update: All orc-slots are taken. |
|
|
Synn
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
|
  Posted:
Apr 02, 2008 - 19:57 |
|
You know Circ.....
I still think this would be better in R as a meta group.
__Synn |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 02, 2008 - 22:43 |
|
Well.. I have no problem putting this as an [R] metagroup, if it proves to be a success. But with [R] comes the problem with being a closed groups of coaches playing games within the group which is against the concept of [R]. If you make it open, then you`ll have the problem that people will feed their teams up to the exact point of TR-caps or whatever you put in place by cherrypicking. As far as I have read, the stable-format also had this problem. So I rather have it in [L] first. If it proves to be vastly popular, maybe we can implement it in [R] but that`s a loooooooong way. |
|
|
pac
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 02, 2008 - 23:48 |
|
Good to see this back. Shame I can't revive my old team from the last version, but I hope to be in anyway!
Also happy to help out with staffing if you need it.
Edit: Are you going to set up a wiki page for the group? I can't remember if we had one last time, but it would seem to be the best way to handle things. |
|
|
McVily
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 01:17 |
|
Cool... I think I'll try this....) |
_________________ In Nuffle we trust |
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 09:42 |
|
pac wrote: | Edit: Are you going to set up a wiki page for the group? I can't remember if we had one last time, but it would seem to be the best way to handle things. |
During the first run, wikis were not exactly popular/frequented. In noticed that has changed, but I have no clue how to work with them.
Update on the team count:
3 Orcs
2 Undead
2 Dwarves
Comeon fellow elve-coaches! This smells like free wins out there! |
|
|
Forrest_Gump
Joined: Sep 25, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 10:51 |
|
Count me in. I'll take Woodies |
_________________ Interested in Team Bloodbowl?
Try out Tilean Triad Trialsfor some fun threesome action!
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 11:32 |
|
All Orc and Undead slots have been taken. Interestingly, the Khemri-run you see in the rookie SMACKs isn`t seen here.
Anyhow.. bring in your teams, so we can kick of the league soon! |
|
|
Khudzlin
Joined: May 24, 2007
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 12:05 |
|
you mention rank-based TR caps, have you decided on them yet? |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 19:20 |
|
The TR-caps will be dependend on how many tiers we get in the pyramid. So far the general thoughts were having the top 2 tiers be free of cap, tier 3 capped around 190 and TR 130 as cap for the lowest tier. |
|
|
BiggieB
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 19:23 |
|
Synn wrote: | You know Circ.....
I still think this would be better in R as a meta group.
__Synn |
what difference does it make? |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
  Posted:
Apr 03, 2008 - 22:16 |
|
Setting an example for non-picking competitive play that would be more visible? |
|
|
|