RawMessiah
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 15:42 |
|
DukeTyrion wrote: | Is it going to be a KO, Group RR, or Full RR?
If it's a full Round Robin, then 20 matches at 3 weeks per round will mean over a year to finish the first season. | True, well, if people keep to 3 weeks before finishing their game, which I'm sure most won't. And it being a big Season 1 is obvious, and hopefully interesting. |
|
|
RawMessiah
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 15:44 |
|
nin wrote: | Gobbos without stars?
Are flings allowed to buy ingredients, or they are wizzard? |
Flings are allowed to buy smelly stuff. Well, Goblins not allowed to hire S-Players... |
|
|
bicarbonateofsteve
Joined: May 24, 2008
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 15:49 |
|
[quote="DukeTyrion"]Is it going to be a KO, Group RR, or Full RR?
If it's a full Round Robin, then 20 matches at 3 weeks per round will mean over a year to finish the first season.[/quote]
good point, now we've bullied you into re-allowing big guys : ) what about sorting out the scheduling rawmessiah... im interested but im not sure a year long league is that interesting, personally i like shorter allowances for time between games, depends on the coaches though.. |
|
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 15:53 |
|
RawMessiah wrote: | DukeTyrion wrote: | Is it going to be a KO, Group RR, or Full RR?
If it's a full Round Robin, then 20 matches at 3 weeks per round will mean over a year to finish the first season. | True, well, if people keep to 3 weeks before finishing their game, which I'm sure most won't. And it being a big Season 1 is obvious, and hopefully interesting. |
Trust me when I tell you someone will always play their match at the last possible moment.
And in a round Robin, the tournament progresses at the speed of the slowest coach. |
|
|
SeraphimRed
Joined: Feb 01, 2004
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 15:55 |
|
I think you need to rethink the whole concept RawM.
A 21 team RR with 3wk round times will really not work, or not work well unless you get the very best of the L division coaches and they have no RL interruption during the course of the league.
Take a look at the World Cup group that G_Force ran, it was a similar concept (I think).
Good luck!
edit::
Some options might be:
1) Use a KO tourney or Open RR formats
2) Seperate teams into smaller RR groups like Rock, Scissors, Paper then having the winners of these groups (The best of each Cat.) playoff against each other to settle on the overall victor (Best team). |
_________________
Enhance YOUR FUMBBL
|
|
Rijssiej
Joined: Jan 04, 2005
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 16:07 |
|
I would be surprised if you get this beyond 5 rounds (out of 21) without drop outs. |
|
|
RawMessiah
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 17:52 |
|
SeraphimRed wrote: | I think you need to rethink the whole concept RawM.
A 21 team RR with 3wk round times will really not work, or not work well unless you get the very best of the L division coaches and they have no RL interruption during the course of the league.
Take a look at the World Cup group that G_Force ran, it was a similar concept (I think).
Good luck!
edit::
Some options might be:
1) Use a KO tourney or Open RR formats
2) Seperate teams into smaller RR groups like Rock, Scissors, Paper then having the winners of these groups (The best of each Cat.) playoff against each other to settle on the overall victor (Best team). |
I've thought about all the possible problems, and yes, there will probably be some people who'll be less serious, which is a bugger with Leagues(!). Your group-thing is a good idea though I'll keep to my first concept, Open Round, all against all. This way we will see who lasts and who goes on to win (and I really hope, haha, that word again, that it'll go to the last round without too many coaches gone "west"). |
|
|
Shades_SteelFist
Joined: Sep 11, 2008
|
  Posted:
Dec 16, 2008 - 17:57 |
|
would be better if all teams where randomly assigned to all coaches involved in a lottery draw, that way everybody is equal |
_________________ Nuffle is cruel but we love him still |
|
RawMessiah
Joined: Nov 01, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 17, 2008 - 15:53 |
|
Shades_SteelFist wrote: | would be better if all teams where randomly assigned to all coaches involved in a lottery draw, that way everybody is equal |
Doing it this way has a negative effect (in my opinion): The teams wouldn't be at their most lethal as the coach might get a team they don't like to coach, which would then make the coach uninterested.
I do like the idea but I'm afraid it wouldn't work... |
|
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
  Posted:
Dec 17, 2008 - 16:09 |
|
Shades_SteelFist wrote: | would be better if all teams where randomly assigned to all coaches involved in a lottery draw, that way everybody is equal |
That sounds like a good variation for the world cup. |
_________________ Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
|