| Poll |
| Are the lizzies at an disadvantage due to the ST-rating? |
| Yes, they are rated higher than their actual strenght. |
|
38% |
[ 63 ] |
| No, they are rated at they actual strenght. |
|
20% |
[ 33 ] |
| No, they are rated lower than their actual strenght. |
|
6% |
[ 10 ] |
| Only nerds or noobs care about team-strenght. |
|
34% |
[ 57 ] |
| Other. (Please state below) |
|
1% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 165 |
|
BunnyPuncher
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Mar 15, 2005 - 18:53 |
 
|
Er.. sure.. maybe...
Anyone have a list with the starting maximised TS rosters for all the races? (From flings 100/77 to Lizzies/dwarfs? 100/116)
Such a list might make comparisons a little easier.
Oh yeah.. lizzies are a strong team... and deserve their TS... until about turn 7-8 in the first half when they have 7 players  |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 15, 2005 - 21:54 |
|
Uhm... Just from adding up some strenght, I get at least TS 118.
But AFAIK I can create a rookie TS133-Lizzie-Team. |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 16, 2005 - 10:52 |
|
In the meantime, I start believing, that I will get games with dwarves easier than with lizzies... |
|
|
origami
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 19, 2005 - 00:21 |
|
I initially voted that lizards are over-rated, but after playing against CircularLogics lizzies, I've changed my mind. In the hands of an inexperienced coach, they are tough to play. However, when played by a coach who knows what he is doing, they perform extremely well. |
|
|
Tinkywinky
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 30, 2005 - 10:49 |
|
| Quote: | | In the hands of an inexperienced coach, they are tough to play. However, when played by a coach who knows what he is doing, they perform extremely well. |
As all teams.  |
_________________
Do you play ranked and wonder where all the good coaches are? Are you also from Sweden? Then join the Swedish league! |
|
Adar
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 30, 2005 - 12:18 |
|
| CircularLogic wrote: | So I really like the competitive atmosphere of the open-league, but you tell me, that I have only the choice to either play games where I am at the disadvantage or to stop playing open?
The whole problem would be solved, if there was a 3rd condition for the +2 ST-addition. Just make it MA>5 AND ST>3 AND AG>1.
This would affect only the lizzies (with exception of the -AG bull or the -AG+MA+MA-BoB), and would bring them on par with the other teams of the same TS. |
Excellent suggestion, I don't theres any reason to not implement it. |
_________________
For all his rage, he's still just a rat in it's cage. |
|
mymLaban
Joined: Apr 20, 2004
|
| Posted:
Apr 30, 2005 - 12:27 |
|
| Tinkywinky wrote: | | Quote: | | In the hands of an inexperienced coach, they are tough to play. However, when played by a coach who knows what he is doing, they perform extremely well. |
As all teams. |
aye all teams get better with a good coach ofcourse, but i would still say that Lizards, ogres and vampires needs a good coach more then most other teams, i havent played Ogres my self but i find them quite easy to beat just like vampires and lizards unless ofcourse they have a really good coach |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Apr 30, 2005 - 13:55 |
|
I just want to point out, that ogres and vamps are MEANT to be for more experienced coachs and rather underpowered in terms of being able to win games.
Lizzies are among the normal teams and meant to be on par with the other races - which they are when looking at the TR, but not when looking at the TS (which is the more important figure on fumbbl). |
|
|
|
|
| |
Finishing the 60 Gam...
Search
