Shrap
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
|
 Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 20:33 |
 
|
What do you think about this plan Crib? |
|
|
Chewie
Joined: Dec 13, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 20:33 |
|
| Fredox wrote: | | And boy is it easy to grt you guys flapping. |
Was that your intention?
We aren't asking for you to burn, just after <i>clarification</i> as to why you have made <b>3</b> slightly suspect posts in a row....
Remember what happened to Nick, and please clarify. |
|
|
Chewie
Joined: Dec 13, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 20:35 |
|
| Shrap wrote: | I'm down with being scanned.
Crib seems to have the gift tho.
I say we let him scan people and until he's dead we only burn known bad guys.
We might as well not do thier (the baddies) job for them.
They are desperate to kill people, when we kill without really knowing if anyone is guilty we help them out if anyone we burn turns out innocent.
Does this seem true?
I say if anyone starts a vote before crib comes out and tells us a target, we burn them or tie the vote up.
I mean anyone who wants to burn random people sounds like a bad guy to me? |
Makes sense to me, but we will still get whittled down by attacks and the like. |
|
|
Fredox
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 20:42 |
|
Everything I have said in my last 3 posts is TRUE Chewie.
Edit1: can believe I spelt is wrong.
Edit2: thanks Shrap |
Last edited by Fredox on %b %22, %2007 - %20:%May; edited 1 time in total |
|
Shrap
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 20:47 |
|
I believe you spelt believe wrong as well! |
|
|
Chewie
Joined: Dec 13, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 20:48 |
|
| Fredox wrote: | | Everything I have said in my last 3 posts is TRUE Chewie. |
Thanks for clearing that up. |
|
|
Shrap
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 20:48 |
|
And chewie: We will get whittled down...but half as fast as if we start burning random innocents. |
|
|
Chewie
Joined: Dec 13, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 21:02 |
|
| Shrap wrote: | | And chewie: We will get whittled down...but half as fast as if we start burning random innocents. |
Burning random innocents = bad. Having an idea of who the bad guys are, without relying on Crib every night = good. |
|
|
Shrap
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 21:16 |
|
Well....I saw my name with SillySod at the top of someones list and I'm an innocent.
And I consider that person a good detective.
Also I have no problem with considering people and detectiving without Crib....the whole burning innocents is what I'm firmly against. |
|
|
Cribbleobblepie
Joined: Dec 15, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 21:29 |
|
Hmmm, to burn or not to burn... that is the question!
Odds are in our favour, time is also in our favour. If the healer heals me every night, then we have enough time to not burn anyone and me to scan everyone so we guarantee only kill bad guys. They have to get through 12 more of us, we only have 4 of them to find. Even if they get lucky and kill the healer, they still have to try me every other night to see if the last kill was the healer! Plus the vampire now has only blind guesses who to attack. If he attacks the wolves thats his night wasted and us safe again. Same for the wolves, just less likely they find the vampire.
I think it makes perfect sense, and statistical sense to hold off the burnings, but...
...where's the fun in that? Wild accusations and name calling seem to make this game far more entertaining!
Rational answer - only burn when I say so, until I'm dead, we pretty much guaranteed win.
Slightly more interesting and amusing answer - LIGHT 'EM UP!!!
 |
_________________
"You've been DONE!" |
|
Cribbleobblepie
Joined: Dec 15, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 21:59 |
|
<i>Cleans up the lager cans and bottles of spirits from the town squares earlier party, and finishes filling the last black bag. Resigning himself to another unsettling night, Cribble decided to head back home and chill, waiting for the inevitable to come...</i>
2 hours to night time! |
_________________
"You've been DONE!" |
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 22:16 |
|
| Shrap wrote: | I'm down with being scanned.
Crib seems to have the gift tho.
I say we let him scan people and until he's dead we only burn known bad guys.
We might as well not do thier (the baddies) job for them.
They are desperate to kill people, when we kill without really knowing if anyone is guilty we help them out if anyone we burn turns out innocent.
Does this seem true?
I say if anyone starts a vote before crib comes out and tells us a target, we burn them or tie the vote up.
I mean anyone who wants to burn random people sounds like a bad guy to me? |
I think this is pretty self explanatory
Vote Shrap
I always liked a more interesting win (the 'safe' way is no garuntee anyway) |
_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
Fredox
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 22:21 |
|
We could always make it real interesting and burn Cribble. Seriously I say we have a couple educated guesses while Cribble has a look around. |
|
|
Shrap
Joined: Sep 18, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 22:27 |
|
Fine with me.
Vote SillySod
Lets see who is more popular! |
|
|
SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 22, 2007 - 22:30 |
|
oh, there goes the no burn policy. Woohoo. Provoked
hehe, you think this is decided by a popularity contest? foolish wolf, this is determined by guilt.
Edit: btw, do you want this fixed so there's no burning? or will you come and have some? |
_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
|
|
Making Assassins mor...
Search
