DaBoss
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:02 |
|
Roll of 8+ will break av.
What use is that? Most teams have 8AV or less any how. Wouldn't Mighty Blow be better? |
|
|
Russo
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/808690181459bc22ca03df.jpg)
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:04 |
|
http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=blog&coach=41576
Read Andy's Blog for an explanation and cool graph
===============
EDIT:
Though I am not sure if LRB5 actually changes anything to do with Claw! |
_________________ BAAA means NO!
[21:35] <@Purp|away> why is it whenever I come to check the PC, Russo is lowering the tone?!
================================
[22:59] <princevaliant> NBL has gotten to be such a dirty channel
[22:59] <princevaliant> ty Russo
BiggieB is my idol
Last edited by Russo on %b %12, %2007 - %21:%Sep; edited 1 time in total |
|
phil78
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/197287004d0e412e6f226.gif)
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:05 |
|
yes, but 8+ is the equivalent of AV7 not AV8 |
|
|
vanGorn
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/7499229124424f6e196862.gif)
Joined: Feb 24, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:08 |
|
and don't forget, the players can get +AV, too. |
_________________ Gimme a pint of fungus beer!
Then we will climb the ladder.
![Image Image](https://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL/Images/ext.png) |
|
orko_oskar
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/1641110027461d3c6dbc096.jpg)
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:29 |
|
And the new claw stacks with MB.
The idea of the new claw is to break high armour not make av7 av5. |
|
|
DaBoss
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:32 |
|
Russo wrote: | http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=blog&coach=41576
Read Andy's Blog for an explanation and cool graph
===============
EDIT:
Though I am not sure if LRB5 actually changes anything to do with Claw! |
We're talking LRB5, not LRB4... That chart is useless. I posted the words for the change with claws.
As someone mentioned a team can take +AV in LRB5 so later on in a league I can see the use of claws, but early on Mighty Blow is better.
However claws now working in conjunction with Mighty Blow can really increase your armor breaking since you'll break armor on a roll of 7, no matter what AV they have.
Anyone want to chop down some trees? |
|
|
JockMcRowdy
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/135176558046d6b92a428f1.jpg)
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:53 |
|
doesnt really make fluff sense though does it, why does a claw do no extra damage vs the most lightly armored? |
_________________ The White Isle League is by far the best Blood Bowl league in the world. FACT!
If you are interested in joining please get in touch. |
|
DaBoss
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 21:55 |
|
JockMcRowdy wrote: | doesnt really make fluff sense though does it, why does a claw do no extra damage vs the most lightly armored? |
That is a good question. |
|
|
pac
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/139963962944f72e4f7e6db.jpg)
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 22:05 |
|
DaBoss wrote: | As someone mentioned a team can take +AV in LRB5 so later on in a league I can see the use of claws, but early on Mighty Blow is better. |
Yes, but Mighty Blow has always been better than Claw (as individual skills, not in combos) - so that much is unchanged.
The power, as others have noted, is in the combination of the two. |
_________________ Join us in building Blood Bowl Sixth Edition.
In other news, the Hittites are back. Join us in #fumbbl.hi ![Very Happy](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
|
Optihut
Joined: Dec 16, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 22:55 |
|
JockMcRowdy wrote: | doesnt really make fluff sense though does it, why does a claw do no extra damage vs the most lightly armored? |
Obviously the lightly armoured will simply dodge from the claw, even when they go down. To reflect this, low armour doesn't change, but the immobile high armour gets shred to an effective value of 7. |
|
|
JanMattys
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/1220176415e8fe414e74e1.jpg)
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 22:57 |
|
DaBoss wrote: | JockMcRowdy wrote: | doesnt really make fluff sense though does it, why does a claw do no extra damage vs the most lightly armored? |
That is a good question. |
A nutcracker is useless against a piece of leather, while it's destructive against a tin can. ![Smile](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif) |
_________________
![Image Image](https://member.thenaf.net/nafsig/?uid=19690) |
|
SnakeSanders
![](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/avatars/upload/10814779564a5f17c4e2fcd.jpg)
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Sep 12, 2007 - 23:19 |
|
no, it was decided that claw goes through heavy padding just as easily as it goes through light clothing, hence AV7, I think, however snotlings and flings just suck ![Wink](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif) |
|
|
SJBenosit
Joined: Nov 20, 2007
|
  Posted:
Nov 20, 2007 - 08:41 |
|
JockMcRowdy wrote: | doesnt really make fluff sense though does it, why does a claw do no extra damage vs the most lightly armored? |
Think of it as a can-opener ![Very Happy](./modules/PNphpBB2/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
|
|
|