koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
 Posted:
Feb 07, 2025 - 12:28 |
 
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Feb 07, 2025 - 17:11 |
|
Lovely seeing hiw little a 1600 redraft impacts teams outside the silly high TV ones that shouldn't exist 😁 |
_________________
 |
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 07, 2025 - 18:15 |
|
|
Bram
Joined: Jan 04, 2008
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 11:18 |
|
I just redrafted my Araby team. It stood at 1660 TV (or something similar - I forgot the exact TV). I ended up with a 1375 TV team after the redraft.
You'd think that 1600 TV cap is enormous, but this is misleading. I ended up with A VERY LOW TV team instead.
I love big teams, but it seems that even here you can't keep them.
Now there's only CIBBL left...
PS: I seem to have lost 3 niggling injuries. Is that normal? It's cool anyway.
| Garion wrote: |
Lovely seeing hiw little a 1600 redraft impacts teams outside the silly high TV ones that shouldn't exist 😁 |
|
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 11:20 |
|
| Bram wrote: |
You'd think that 1600 TV cap is enormous, but this is misleading. I ended up with A VERY LOW TV team instead.
I love big teams, but it seems that even here you can't keep them.
|
Time for an: "Increasing the max Re-Draft budget to ..." thread.
| Bram wrote: |
PS: I seem to have lost 3 niggling injuries. Is that normal? It's cool anyway. |
The explanation is:
once the team has been modified to comply, the redrafting process can be completed and the following sequence will be performed:
1. All Miss Next Game injuries on players will be removed
2. For each niggling injury on the players, a d6 roll will be made where rolling 4 or higher will remove the niggling injury (a +1 modifier is applied if the team has an apothecary)
3. For each "lasting injury" on a temporarily retired player, a d6 roll will be made in the same way as for niggling injuries above. If successful, the lasting injury is converted to a niggling injury instead. This newly created niggling injury will not be rolled for. |
|
|
Bram
Joined: Jan 04, 2008
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 12:36 |
|
| MattDakka wrote: | | Bram wrote: |
You'd think that 1600 TV cap is enormous, but this is misleading. I ended up with A VERY LOW TV team instead.
I love big teams, but it seems that even here you can't keep them.
|
Time for an: "Increasing the max Re-Draft budget to ..." thread.
| Bram wrote: |
PS: I seem to have lost 3 niggling injuries. Is that normal? It's cool anyway. |
The explanation is:
once the team has been modified to comply, the redrafting process can be completed and the following sequence will be performed:
1. All Miss Next Game injuries on players will be removed
2. For each niggling injury on the players, a d6 roll will be made where rolling 4 or higher will remove the niggling injury (a +1 modifier is applied if the team has an apothecary)
3. For each "lasting injury" on a temporarily retired player, a d6 roll will be made in the same way as for niggling injuries above. If successful, the lasting injury is converted to a niggling injury instead. This newly created niggling injury will not be rolled for. |
Thanks for explaining. So I rolled three 4+ then. Cool.
So let's increase the redraft threshold to 2000 TV  |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 12:57 |
|
your team is looking pretty healthy for starting season 2 lots of time to keep building |
_________________
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:00 |
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:12 |
|
| Bram wrote: |
Thanks for explaining. So I rolled three 4+ then. Cool.
|
Cheers!
If your team had the Apo just a 3+ was necessary to heal the NI, otherwise 4+. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:22 |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:24 |
|
| Bram wrote: |
So let's increase the redraft threshold to 2000 TV |
Increasing the re-draft limit is irrelevant if you don't increase the budget aloted for games played, wins etc.... |
_________________
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:26 |
|
| koadah wrote: |
I think that you are not supposed to keep that many players.
This is the min/max ruleset.
Or I suppose 1/2 season only ruleset. |
Or Amazons & Norse ruleset.  |
|
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:28 |
|
| MattDakka wrote: | | koadah wrote: |
I think that you are not supposed to keep that many players.
This is the min/max ruleset.
Or I suppose 1/2 season only ruleset. |
Or Amazons & Norse ruleset. |
you forgot dorf and orc |
_________________
|
|
MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:32 |
|
Well, even Undead are good. Orcs and Dwarfs are good indeed, but they have slower ball carrier players.
Both Norse and Amazons have MA 7 players out of the box to carry the ball.
I guess that, if I had to pick two races only to play in this ruleset., I'd choose Norse and Amazons for the reason above. A MA 7 ball carrier after each Re-Draft is great. |
Last edited by MattDakka on Feb 08, 2025; edited 1 time in total |
|
Garion
Joined: Aug 19, 2009
|
| Posted:
Feb 08, 2025 - 13:34 |
|
Bram - Did you keep rookie players for an extra 20k? |
_________________
|
|
|
|
Things we dislike of...
Search
