BigMac
Joined: Dec 19, 2004
|
 Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 17:32 |
 
|
you know "Hall of Fame Style", maybe even show only 16, with an additional "show all option". |
Last edited by BigMac on %b %04, %2006 - %23:%May; edited 2 times in total |
|
Meech
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 17:41 |
|
By least to most are you referring to SPP? |
_________________
Putting the FU in fumbbl since 9/2005 |
|
DonTomaso
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 17:42 |
|
Least to most anything would probably be equally difficult or easy to create... |
_________________
====================================
Be careful, my common sense is tingling! |
|
BigMac
Joined: Dec 19, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 22:32 |
|
messed it up, blame my english. MOST TO LEAST, of course! |
|
|
SnakeSanders
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 22:37 |
|
| DonTomaso wrote: | | Least to most anything would probably be equally difficult or easy to create... |
probably changinf the SQL to something like
$query = "SELECT var1, var2 FROM EVENTS ORDER BY $SPPs DESC"; |
|
|
AFK_Eagle
Joined: Mar 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 22:43 |
|
For teams like my Weapon Masters skaven, who have several hundred past players, that might not be as easy to implement as for teams with only a couple dozen... |
_________________
Listen to Eagle! Eagle is good, Eagle is wise!
Founder of the E.L.F.--These elves will play anybody! |
|
Meech
Joined: Sep 15, 2005
|
| Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 22:56 |
|
AFK, I was doing researc about Number of past players vs. number of games played and you have 236 past players. |
_________________
Putting the FU in fumbbl since 9/2005 |
|
AFK_Eagle
Joined: Mar 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 04, 2006 - 23:08 |
|
Broken down as:
127 linerats
55 gutters
25 storm vermin
17 throwers
11 rat ogres
Ok, my #games exceeds #past players, so I'm not quite losing a player a game. Though some times it sure feels like it... |
_________________
Listen to Eagle! Eagle is good, Eagle is wise!
Founder of the E.L.F.--These elves will play anybody! |
|
PLATYPUS
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 05, 2006 - 02:49 |
|
Is there an order in the current version. It seems to be quite random. I would like to have them in order of their retirement/death time. |
|
|
Spaceman_Spiff
Joined: Oct 22, 2004
|
| Posted:
May 05, 2006 - 02:56 |
|
Even if there was SOME sort of order it'd be nice. It'd be nice to see them ordered by SPPs, games played, chronological, position, or hell, even alphabetical would be better than nothing. |
|
|
Bamboo
Joined: Mar 11, 2006
|
| Posted:
May 05, 2006 - 03:07 |
|
Seems to be done by reverse-order of player number at the moment... how logical. Maybe somehow that's why Fumbbl authorities are against switching around Player Numbers... see other thread... |
|
|
Mnemon
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
May 05, 2006 - 09:33 |
|
Nope.
It's quite simple. They are sorted by "player ID" ... i.e. that continous number that is unique to each player created on fumbbl. I.e. it is in the chronological order of when these players where hired for the team.
That's why the 12 on the end of the list on my Tiny Explosions are the original members of the team, with the Ogres (that I bought first) right at the bottom.
-Mnemon |
|
|
|
|
TSC Draft
Search
