ramchop
Joined: Oct 12, 2013
|
I'm curious as to how long term established leagues (ruleset #6) are handling the current treasury rules. No spriralling expenses, no expensive mistakes. We're in a bit of a limbo where the cash just piles up.
In DIBBL I'm implementing the following:
"Existing teams and returning teams who have not played friendlies since leaving the league:Â
No cap on TW. However if TV+treasury>2100k, then treasury must be cut to 100kÂ
e.g. TW = 1950, treasury can be no more than 150k; TW = 2000, treasury can be no more than 100k; TW = 2500k treasury can be no more than 100k.Â
The treasury restriction is only for the first game of the season, treasury can grow freely throughout the season."
This league we have new entrants at 1500k tv competeing in the same pool as established >2200k teams. This is a small attempt at keeping things in check so that the monsters don't have a monster cash safety net. There is grumbling among the ranks (there always is).
How are other leagues doing it? |
|
|
JackassRampant
Joined: Feb 26, 2011
|
  Posted:
Jul 23, 2018 - 04:42 |
|
NBFL is premised on all teams having bank, so we love the status quo. |
_________________ Lude enixe, obliviscatur timor. |
|
Sp00keh
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
|
  Posted:
Jul 23, 2018 - 09:25 |
|
WIL and OBBA, cash piles up but you can't use it to buy inducements
So it's only useful to replace players, so it's not really a problem |
|
|
razmus
Joined: Jun 23, 2017
|
  Posted:
Jul 23, 2018 - 13:14 |
|
I've been ignoring the buildup in treasury. If overdogs use it to induce, they give away more inducement money. Underdogs first lose their free money if they use their own money for inducements. (I've never tried dumping a ton of cash into a game where I'm an underdog to find out if I'd be giving away inducement money to the overdog.) My feeling is that the money builds up because there isn't anything worthwhile on which to spend the money. I'd say it's a safety net that allows teams to easily replace players if something unexpected happens to them. (Well, unexpected except for me... I totally expect to lose a few players in most games.) Treasury really isn't something that my poor meat calculator factors in when I'm facing monster teams.
My goblins wanna keep their treasury, 'cause they said they're planning to all retire to someplace warm and dark and I anticipate having to replace a dozen gobbos all at once. |
_________________ OWRR20 is recruiting Rookie [SL20]
OWB is recruiting [SL20] Teams
BB2020 badges |
|
Antithesisoftime
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
|
  Posted:
Jul 23, 2018 - 18:08 |
|
SLA has Expensive Mistakes, but also uses the old rules to transfer treasury to petty cash before a game.
That said, that system is currently buggy, and the underdog ends up spending treasury cash to cover that difference. If anyone is in a ruleset that does similar, then please be ready to speak to an admin about your treasury if an overdog induces anything. |
|
|
razmus
Joined: Jun 23, 2017
|
  Posted:
Jul 23, 2018 - 19:36 |
|
(I'll frequently induce a Babe even as an overdog in SLA/SLO just to burn off cash to stay below 200k.) |
|
|
Antithesisoftime
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
|
  Posted:
Jul 23, 2018 - 19:39 |
|
That's what I did against Craftnburn
He took his extra 100k in free inducements, and it took it from his treasury. |
|
|
|
| |