Azure
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
|
 Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 03:29 |
 
|
My understanding is that tournament weight (TW) is calculated by taking your team value (TV) and adding the value of your missing players and your cash.
The problem is an issue of double counting - if you have 3 missing linemen and 3 journeymen...then you should not have both being added to your TW.
I would ask that for every missing player, only the difference between the value of the missing player and the value of the journeymen is added.
Not going to belabor the point - hopefully it is clear without me spelling everything out. Just suggesting we use (imo) a more accurate measurement. |
Last edited by Azure on %b %14, %2011 - %00:%Mar; edited 1 time in total |
|
studmandudebro
Joined: Apr 28, 2009
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 03:44 |
|
i dont think that its worth the coding effort TW will only matter for minors really anyway maybe a low priority thing, something about teams with multiple jounreymen entering a tourney doesnt seem right |
|
|
SavageJ
Joined: Dec 02, 2008
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 04:29 |
|
I've been working on a simple statement of the logic (because that makes the coding of most things straightforward).
If regular players < 11, count all the regular players and any potential journeymen up to a total of 11 players counted
If regular players >= 11, count all the regular players only
Anyone see a problem with that? My thought is that journeymen should only count when they're being used as regular players, rather than as temporary substitutes, but they should be counted whether they are present or not if the team has less than 11 players. |
|
|
Rabe
Joined: Jun 06, 2009
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 06:13 |
|
| SavageJ wrote: | I've been working on a simple statement of the logic (because that makes the coding of most things straightforward).
If regular players < 11, count all the regular players and any potential journeymen up to a total of 11 players counted
If regular players >= 11, count all the regular players only
Anyone see a problem with that? My thought is that journeymen should only count when they're being used as regular players, rather than as temporary substitutes, but they should be counted whether they are present or not if the team has less than 11 players. |
+1 |
|
|
Azure
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 06:31 |
|
| studmandudebro wrote: | | i dont think that its worth the coding effort TW will only matter for minors really anyway maybe a low priority thing, something about teams with multiple jounreymen entering a tourney doesnt seem right |
It was an issue when we were trying to get teams together for a smack. |
|
|
jarvis_pants
Joined: Oct 30, 2008
|
| Rabe wrote: | | SavageJ wrote: | I've been working on a simple statement of the logic (because that makes the coding of most things straightforward).
If regular players < 11, count all the regular players and any potential journeymen up to a total of 11 players counted
If regular players >= 11, count all the regular players only
Anyone see a problem with that? My thought is that journeymen should only count when they're being used as regular players, rather than as temporary substitutes, but they should be counted whether they are present or not if the team has less than 11 players. |
+1 |
+1 = 2 |
_________________
"May Nuffle have mercy on your rolls." - St.Basher |
|
Keith-Lemon
Joined: Feb 26, 2011
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 09:48 |
|
How about just get league division and fix some bugs first  |
|
|
SzieberthAdam
Joined: Aug 31, 2008
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 10:09 |
|
| Keith-Lemon wrote: | | How about just get league division and fix some bugs first |
+1 |
_________________
   |
|
Frankenstein
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 10:53 |
|
| Keith-Lemon wrote: | | How about just get league division and fix some bugs first |
Indeed.
The extremly time-consuming efforts to tweak that formula will certainly delay those implementations massively.  |
Last edited by Frankenstein on %b %14, %2011 - %00:%Mar; edited 1 time in total |
|
Hero164
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
|
| Posted:
Mar 13, 2011 - 11:21 |
|
|
Azure
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
|
| Posted:
Mar 14, 2011 - 00:11 |
|
I added a poll to the initial post. |
|
|
jarvis_pants
Joined: Oct 30, 2008
|
Who voted no? |
_________________
"May Nuffle have mercy on your rolls." - St.Basher |
|
|
|
Exempt teams
Search
