MattDakka
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
|
  Posted:
Aug 22, 2017 - 17:52 |
|
Zirgantz wrote: | What could be a nice improvement for the future would be to take the number of games played into greater account : I'm not familiar with the math at work, but it seems that currently, a coach with, say, 8 games played with a win % of 75% can sit at the top of some races' rankings forever, while a coach with a win % of 60% over the course of, say, 300 games, will be ranked far lower, even though he may very well be the better coach of the two with that particular race. |
Ranking decay would fix that. |
|
|