Kommando
Joined: Dec 08, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 15:25 |
|
ezekiel: i am trying to take care of that (as a matter of fact, two BG-teams by me are waiting for approval atm), others will join. but you may as well help and join with a new BG-stunty team |
|
|
johan
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 15:26 |
|
Jeez Ezekiel, give us an hour or two.
I just added my Strigoyans. I will use the Lord without General Access (even though he's not technically a Big Guy), since that ought to be implemented if G access is removed.
/johan |
_________________ ”It's very sad
To see the ancient and distinguished game that used to be
A model of decorum and tranquillity
Become like any other sport, a battleground...”
—Benny Andersson & Björn Ulvaeus, Chess |
|
Ezekiel
Joined: Jun 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 15:30 |
|
ok, just thinking its funny that the ones really wanting to make a difference with bigguys create gnomes, cheaters and squigs as their first teams:) |
|
|
Kommando
Joined: Dec 08, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 15:32 |
|
if you take a closer look, these teams were not created just now, they were already existing teams. even though my skyre slaves hadn't got a game in yet
actually the strigos are giving me a headache. is the lord supposed to lose G access too? i'd think yes, any other thoughts on that? |
|
|
Ezekiel
Joined: Jun 29, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 15:36 |
|
Hmm thats a good question... i dont see lords as big guys... more like mummies.
But really doesnt matter for me
does mummies still get g access? |
|
|
nazerdemus
Joined: Nov 02, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 15:39 |
|
yes mummys are postional not bgs , I have a fairies team awaiting approval which will join shortly as well.
As far as Im aware only players with Big Guy in there skills line are considered BGs for this Skill change |
|
|
johan
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 15:59 |
|
I think that if the Big Guys loses general access, it would be pretty nasty to keep it on the Lord, especially as he starts with RSC. Block/Tackle/Multiblock/Pro/RSC/MB is enough to give me bad dreams, and that's without a single double.
Strength + Agility access will still make him a damned good dodger (Dodge + Break Tackle), and Dodge will actually be good for something when not every Big Guy will have Tackle.
/johan |
_________________ ”It's very sad
To see the ancient and distinguished game that used to be
A model of decorum and tranquillity
Become like any other sport, a battleground...”
—Benny Andersson & Björn Ulvaeus, Chess |
|
Kommando
Joined: Dec 08, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 16:03 |
|
i tend to agree johan, but lets hear a few more voices maybe |
|
|
mutescreamer
Joined: Apr 09, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 16:13 |
|
its a tough call tbh......
although not technically a big guy, with gen access he would be able to out bash most big guys, but will ruin the fluff a wee bit by letting vamplings take it, but not their lord. However as he can use rerolls, should be regarded as the "leader of the team" and suffers from OFAB he doesn't really follow the normal big guy rules (plus there is only one of him)
team consistency vs league consistency,
One thing is for sure.....strigs will become way too popular if he gets to keep gen access |
|
|
johan
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 16:17 |
|
And Strigs already got a boost when Pro was made a general skill. Not that they didn't need it - they suck in so many ways.
/johan |
_________________ ”It's very sad
To see the ancient and distinguished game that used to be
A model of decorum and tranquillity
Become like any other sport, a battleground...”
—Benny Andersson & Björn Ulvaeus, Chess |
|
nazerdemus
Joined: Nov 02, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 16:22 |
|
I think for the purpose of the League we should definetly let them have access as this is a true representation of how it will be different , will it make strigs too strong ? lets find out . |
|
|
johan
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 16:26 |
|
Okay, either is cool with me.
I guess it's playtesting either way.
/johan |
_________________ ”It's very sad
To see the ancient and distinguished game that used to be
A model of decorum and tranquillity
Become like any other sport, a battleground...”
—Benny Andersson & Björn Ulvaeus, Chess |
|
nazerdemus
Joined: Nov 02, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 17:18 |
|
Okay at the moment 41 people have voted that big guys shouldnt have general in stunty , here now is the chance to do the playtesting that is nessasary to find this out .
So if your a great coach or a lame coach , a big guy lover or a big guy hater , a game a week player or an 8 games a day player , get your unranked Stunty Teams together and get them into the Stunty Revolutions Playtest League .
Click the sig or any of the other numerous links to the league , do it now
Also if people aint too sure aqbout the subject join in and see what its like , to be honest I aint sure myself . But It will be intresting finding out . I especially invite Peikko to enter a team , I know your busy but if you can spare the odd hour to try it this way i think it will please people to see you in the playtest , and also would help you see for yourself . Like I said you could be right about it and this wont work , but lets find out . |
|
|
Mully
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 17:41 |
|
Shouldnt you guys really wait till the new rules are actually implemented in FUMBBL.
Otherwise you will still have the issuse of Div-U big guys being able to get G access skills. Then there is no way of knowing if he took it on a doubles or not.
Am i missing something? |
_________________ Owner of the REAL Larson
Come join the CCC League |
|
nazerdemus
Joined: Nov 02, 2004
|
  Posted:
Nov 25, 2004 - 17:46 |
|
To join the league you have to be unranked and have no general skills for your Big Guys , I dont care if you swear on your grannies grave he got them from doubles , and obviously once your in you have to follow the rules , as far as I know unranked teams aint got general for their big guys |
|
|
|