odi
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 09:29 |
 
|
I was just wondering, if people would be interested in playing TR100 tourneys. Every season you would start with a new TR100 team. I'm not really sure if people would be interested in this, I would. If the season is not too long, you shouldn't have any problems with letting the team go after the season, because they shouldn't be that developed yet, and creating a new one. And ofcourse people who had taken part in the previous season, would be allowed to join the next season (with new TR100 teams).
Any comments on the idea?
I thought that depending on the amount of people, it would be either a round robin (if not that many people taking part), or a KO tourney (if there are many people joining).
Interested people atm, it still doesn't mean they will be playing, but interested (in bold if team allready submitted or participation confirmed):
Odi
Captain1821
Tinkywinky
Cirion
Shinan
petsku
ChrisB
Askrum
peikko
Janzki
AvatarDM
Ebenezer
Kharnath
Webbe
Flaymin
Bascrebolder
*savsta Retired his team after 2 losses, permanent ban to the tourney
Bluetooth * Brought in to replace Savsta
Just made the group page, feel free to submit your teams. But remember to post in this thread too, because the free slots are distributed on first come first served basis. |
Last edited by odi on %b %22, %2005 - %11:%Feb; edited 19 times in total |
|
Captain1821
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 10:10 |
|
I like that kind of tourneys |
_________________
STATUS: CLOWN |
|
Tinkywinky
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 10:53 |
|
I would be interested in that. Or you could do it like a non-development tournament? Or best of all, make people stay under 120 tr? |
_________________
Do you play ranked and wonder where all the good coaches are? Are you also from Sweden? Then join the Swedish league! |
|
odi
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 11:58 |
|
TR cap? Hmm?
It could work, but I was really thinking about having a bunch of coaches, who are committed to playing in tournaments, a season after season, with team progression, but with having them to "reset" (i.e. make a new team) after the season. This would solve the biggest problem I see in the big continuous tournaments we have, that they will eventually be full of teams that survive (read: good AV) longer. Imho this would give us more different races into the tourney.
Let's say we manage to get a group of 6-8 players to the first season, we could make it a round robin season, that would mean every team would play 5-7 games. And maybe playoffs?
If we manage to get 12 to 16 players, we could have 2 divisions, with 6 to 8 players in each. And after the season is over, the champions of both divs would battle for the championship. I think a round robin of 16 players would be problematic for taking too long (15 weeks if it's 1 game a week), and propably some coaches losing interest during that time. I was kinda thinking that a season would last for about 2 months. That would allow a season to consist of 8 games, if played once a week.
Ofcourse I'm open suggestions and everyone's opinions. |
Last edited by odi on %b %31, %2005 - %12:%Jan; edited 1 time in total |
|
Cirion
Joined: Mar 31, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 12:00 |
|
I think it sounds like a great idea, just skip the tr-cap, would spoil the fun for the winner. |
|
|
Shinan
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 12:05 |
|
I for one would like more non-progression tournaments. Or maybe even non-progression tournaments at 120TR or something... (If that's even possible) |
_________________
"Älä löi, en ole hurrit." |
|
Kharnath
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 12:13 |
|
I like the idea of a TR100 tournament, too. |
|
|
Renegade
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 12:56 |
|
|
petsku
Joined: Oct 11, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 13:13 |
|
|
Tinkywinky
Joined: Aug 25, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 13:19 |
|
I think it's best to not be more than 8 coaches, more than that and i can guarantee that we won't be able to finish the season. I think it would be nice to play as you have described and then give the coaches placement points after each season. We can hold cups too but if we play a round robin it feels silly to end it with a play-off as the round robin wouldn't matter much. |
_________________
Do you play ranked and wonder where all the good coaches are? Are you also from Sweden? Then join the Swedish league! |
|
odi
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 13:58 |
|
good point about the playoffs, round robin with max 8 coaches sounds good for first season, if it works out well, we could try to expand it to 2 divisions in season2. I think that 8 coaches in round robin would be the maximum, otherwise the seasons wil be too long.
I'll try to get the group set up today evening, people who have replied to this thread have the priority to join in on first come first served base.
odi |
|
|
ChrisB
Joined: Nov 28, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 17:25 |
|
My prefered tourney - let me know if you set it up |
|
|
Askrum
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 17:32 |
|
Put me up, I'm interested! |
|
|
peikko
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 17:38 |
|
Hmmm, peikko beating odi to pulp? Sounds good enough reason to get beaten by everybody else, Im in! |
|
|
Janzki
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Jan 31, 2005 - 18:52 |
|
Count me in too.
-Janzki |
_________________
Even he, to whom most things that most people would think were pretty smart were pretty dumb, thought it was pretty smart.
-Douglas Adams |
|
|
|
| |
Gnomes are trash
Search
