Captain1821
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
|
 Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 18:29 |
 
|
As I was really bored, I found this:
The "Average team fanfactor" we have at our info page is calculated from the fanfactor of both our active and retired teams.
Until now, I thought that the "Average team fanfactor" was calculated only from the fanfactor of the active teams.
I know it is not very important but I thought that it is not bad to let you guys know.
Oh, btw, it would be nice only the active teams to be concidered for this stat, wouldn't it?  |
_________________
STATUS: CLOWN |
|
HollowOne
Joined: Sep 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 18:50 |
|
I agree. |
_________________
A censor is a man who knows more than he thinks you ought to. - Granville Hicks |
|
keggiemckill
Joined: Oct 07, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 18:58 |
|
I second that. |
_________________
The Drunker I get, the more I spill
"Keggie is the guy with the bleach blond hair that gives answers nobody else would think of."
Jeffro |
|
MrMojo
Joined: Apr 17, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 19:02 |
|
/signed |
_________________
My post count
Jesus loves me this I know, 'cos my Bible tells me so. |
|
JanMattys
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 19:08 |
|
Me too.
ps: you must be REALLY bored! lol  |
_________________
Last edited by JanMattys on %b %27, %2005 - %19:%Aug; edited 1 time in total |
|
Karhumies
Joined: Oct 17, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 19:08 |
|
|
Captain1821
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 19:40 |
|
| Karhumies wrote: | | Why do we even need this value in the first place? |
It is a nice fluff stat |
_________________
STATUS: CLOWN |
|
Kyojima
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 19:49 |
|
I wouldn't call it fluff any more than the avg scoring and cas listings are. |
|
|
vanGorn
Joined: Feb 24, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 20:16 |
|
I prefer the actual formula with the retired teams included in the calculation. It is more significant. |
_________________
Gimme a pint of fungus beer!
Then we will climb the ladder.
 |
|
Captain1821
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 27, 2005 - 20:40 |
|
| Kyojima wrote: | | I wouldn't call it fluff any more than the avg scoring and cas listings are. |
Me neither |
_________________
STATUS: CLOWN |
|
AFK_Eagle
Joined: Mar 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Aug 28, 2005 - 02:04 |
|
| vanGorn wrote: | | I prefer the actual formula with the retired teams included in the calculation. It is more significant. |
If you were going to do that, I'd say have two different formulas...one with retired teams, one without. I know in my case at least, my early teams (when I was still learning how to play) had severe FF problems, not from starting low (virtually always FF 9 to start) but from losing games and not scoring, thus losing during the team's career. My first year, I never had anybody get into the double-digits FF. This past year (not counting my time off) my teams were avering the high-teens, low-twenties, including a high of FF 28 if I remember right. But from the preponderence of retired, busted teams of low FF, my all-time average FF is only 9.something. Does this accurately reflect the player I am today, where my active teams would average 15-16, thus indicating to others that I know what I'm doing when I play?
Does it matter? Not really, but for the purposes of this discussion, I say not to include the retired teams. |
_________________
Listen to Eagle! Eagle is good, Eagle is wise!
Founder of the E.L.F.--These elves will play anybody! |
|
|
|
NBFL Season 32: The ...
Search
