Posted by SzieberthAdam on 2013-10-16 18:01:46
I hate companies forcing people to update their shit.
Posted by Garion on 2013-10-16 18:25:48
I hate java...
Posted by WingedHuman on 2013-10-16 18:48:04
You can either update or leave yourself open to vulnerabilities, and malware.
Without Java we wouldn't have the BBC. Carry on.
Posted by Cavetroll on 2013-10-16 18:56:48
I hate nuffle.
Posted by Throweck on 2013-10-16 19:03:19
I hate Java but love Jaffa cakes.
Posted by Jeffro on 2013-10-16 19:18:55
"Look Mr. Moto, I'm a coffee pot!"
(I'll rate 6 if someone can name the tune those lyrics are from ;)
Posted by Badoek on 2013-10-16 19:27:42
Shoot me the pot and I'll pour me a shot.
Google spoils the fun :s
Posted by Throweck on 2013-10-16 19:27:42
Java Jive by Oakland and Drake?!
/holds head in shame for selling soul to google
Posted by Garion on 2013-10-16 19:28:20
Without java we wouldn't have the BBC??? How do you figure that :s
Posted by DeZigma on 2013-10-16 21:52:17
Well maybe Nuffle lives in JAVA!
Posted by Jeffro on 2013-10-16 21:54:43
Good job, kids. Rated 7.045
Posted by B_SIDE on 2013-10-16 22:44:13
If Java didn't exist, we would have to invent it. Java is... INEVITABLE.
Posted by Overhamsteren on 2013-10-16 22:46:24
But it runs on more than 65 billion devices, it must be awesome!??!! :O
Posted by Verminardo on 2013-10-16 23:10:55
It just told me that unsecure applications like this one will be blocked in future releases?
Posted by eldritchfox on 2013-10-17 00:12:50
Everytime I open the client I have to authorise java to run it. Is there a way to tell java the client is safe?
Posted by xnoelx on 2013-10-17 00:54:51
No, since Java update 40 there's no way to get around that warning box.