Shraaaag
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 07, 2010 - 18:40 |
|
Would love to see the average time difference between LRB4 and FFB games. So far I experience FFB games as faster, which IMO makes them more enjoyable, and make it possible to play even more games |
_________________
|
|
Shraaaag
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 09:45 |
|
FFB keeps rising in popularity. It's been far ahead of Ranked the last couple of days. |
_________________
|
|
freak_in_a_frock
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 09:47 |
|
Indeed, and as each new version comes out i expect it to only get more popular. If we can get Calcium to enjoy it, the we can probably convince most people (zombie69 aside) |
|
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 11:54 |
|
freak_in_a_frock wrote: | ... we can probably convince most people (zombie69 aside) |
I believe even the Flat Earth Society still has members |
|
|
Wreckage
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
|
  Posted:
Sep 11, 2010 - 17:13 |
|
Shraaaag wrote: | Would love to see the average time difference between LRB4 and FFB games. So far I experience FFB games as faster, which IMO makes them more enjoyable, and make it possible to play even more games |
I dunno... for me every game the players move very slow. Only the auto-move option helps to compensate a little bit. |
|
|
WhatBall
Joined: Aug 21, 2008
|
  Posted:
Sep 13, 2010 - 18:57 |
|
FFB broke the 150 single-day game mark and fumbbl looks to have gone over 300 games in a day for the first time in a while. More positive movement. |
|
|
freak_in_a_frock
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
  Posted:
Sep 13, 2010 - 19:00 |
|
And we now have our first complete week with the new client the most popular division. |
|
|
maysrill
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
|
  Posted:
Sep 13, 2010 - 19:05 |
|
Wreckage wrote: | Shraaaag wrote: | Would love to see the average time difference between LRB4 and FFB games. So far I experience FFB games as faster, which IMO makes them more enjoyable, and make it possible to play even more games |
I dunno... for me every game the players move very slow. Only the auto-move option helps to compensate a little bit. |
I think people's various java versions account for the differences in client responsiveness.
For me, the length of the game has been massively dependent on player experience. I've run into some very new players drawn in by the FFB client, and they have been slow. Nothing against them, but it skews the average. Games I've played against vets hum right along in the ~35-40 min range. |
|
|
|