MRnobody
Joined: Jul 01, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 04, 2015 - 13:12 |
|
Undead if you want a good shot at winning. Khemri are just not as competitive of a team, and you have over a week to prep the undead. |
_________________ Kill a pixel, Sponsor a Cheater! |
|
Jan-Erik
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
|
  Posted:
May 04, 2015 - 13:30 |
|
|
seanh1986
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
|
  Posted:
May 04, 2015 - 22:58 |
|
Seems the community really wants Foul Nagash! I'm surprised, I figured Cult of the Scourge would get more votes.
What are people's opinions on taking Wrestle on a ghoul (i.e., to make a ghoul a sacker)... I've never done it before but it seemed like something that people would normally do... So, I looked through some high-end undead teams and it seemed most did not have wrestle on ghouls and had no dedicated sacker... Anyone want to share some thoughts on that? |
|
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
  Posted:
May 04, 2015 - 23:06 |
|
footballolb16 wrote: | Seems the community really wants Foul Nagash! I'm surprised, I figured Cult of the Scourge would get more votes.
|
Well then you are not "reading" the comments properly. They are telling you to bring Khemri on the hopes of playing you so they can get a 95% win chance in the first round.
You think they are trying to help but in reality they are trying to help themselves.
All under the premise that if they can eliminate one coach the first round to a bad team selection then they are one step closer to the second round. |
_________________ Comish of the: |
|
Rabe
Joined: Jun 06, 2009
|
  Posted:
May 05, 2015 - 00:12 |
|
Or they assume that you'll for sure play Khemri in the Forlorn qualifier - and therefor won't meet them if they play anywhere else themselves.
To be fair, a well developed Khemri team is just way rarer and cooler than an Undead team. And coolness is worth a lot - in the community and in the GLT! |
_________________ .
|
|