38 coaches online • Server time: 01:21
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Blood Bowl 2024 Edit...goto Post NBFL Season 32: The ...goto Post RNG speculations
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Harpick



Joined: Oct 07, 2023

Post   Posted: Oct 24, 2023 - 17:28 Reply with quote Back to top

I played a lot vampires in LRB6 and these one are close.
I might have a different playstyle than you, but for me :

Thrall : Kick for the first one that get to 6 SPP, then random generals for the others, hopping to get block or wrestle.

Thrower :
first one : leader then dodge, block, sidestep
Other one : dodge block sidestep, then probably stat

Blitzers :
That I don't know. Right now I would say pro first, then dodge, then tackle for one, block for the other one

Runner, only one :
Dodge, Block, Sidestep, stats

Dodge is the most important skill for vampires as I play them (and many "BB2016" vampire players agree), since you don't block that much, often you want to start your turn with an hypnogaze to blitz the right guy. This way you can dodge your vampire to do so before anything else without having to burn your rerolls on it.
And it gives your vampires as more sustainability than block, since ealry, few players in opposing teams have tacle. Blitzers don't need block early for me, since they already have juggernaut to prevent turnovers.
Malmir



Joined: May 20, 2008

Post   Posted: Oct 24, 2023 - 18:11 Reply with quote Back to top

Playing against vamps right now and their vamp failed bloodlust in turn 8 whilst carrying the ball. I assumed he'd need a dodge to make it to the endzone to be next to a thrall, but instead he went in the endzone and then walked another square in the endzone to get next to the thrall. Is that a bug? I think it either is a bug or is a rule fail. My oppo disagreed and neither of us were the slightest bit biased Smile
Harpick



Joined: Oct 07, 2023

Post   Posted: Oct 24, 2023 - 18:50 Reply with quote Back to top

In my opinion, it's not clear. In BB2, it was like you said, being in endzone is instant turnover if no thrall next to you.
Here it says that "at end of activation" must bite, but not clearly stated that being in end zone ends activation in that case.
I would say like you, but Imo a FAQ is required on this topic. Wouldn't be the first time GA state a rule different of what it used to be. (and on a flavor point of view, there's no reason after crossing the line thirsty, he don't make an extra step to drink)
Gridironman



Joined: Mar 18, 2022

Post   Posted: Oct 24, 2023 - 21:28 Reply with quote Back to top

Harpick wrote:
In my opinion, it's not clear. In BB2, it was like you said, being in endzone is instant turnover if no thrall next to you.
Here it says that "at end of activation" must bite, but not clearly stated that being in end zone ends activation in that case.
I would say like you, but Imo a FAQ is required on this topic. Wouldn't be the first time GA state a rule different of what it used to be. (and on a flavor point of view, there's no reason after crossing the line thirsty, he don't make an extra step to drink)


If there is no thrall it is considered a turnover--per the rules If they do not bite a thrall for any reason then a turnover is caused, the player will lose their tackle zone until their are next activated, and will immediately drop the ball if they were holding it. If the player was in the opposing End Zone, no touchdown is scored.

According to GW: https://www.warhammer-community.com/2023/09/21/blood-bowl-how-the-vampire-team-rose-again/

A more efficient rule resource: https://mordorbihan.fr/en/bloodbowl/skills/2020

_________________
An Amorican Nuffler that bashed in his youth.
Gridironman



Joined: Mar 18, 2022

Post   Posted: Oct 24, 2023 - 21:31 Reply with quote Back to top

Harpick wrote:
I played a lot vampires in LRB6 and these one are close.
I might have a different playstyle than you, but for me :

Thrall : Kick for the first one that get to 6 SPP, then random generals for the others, hopping to get block or wrestle.

Thrower :
first one : leader then dodge, block, sidestep
Other one : dodge block sidestep, then probably stat

Blitzers :
That I don't know. Right now I would say pro first, then dodge, then tackle for one, block for the other one

Runner, only one :
Dodge, Block, Sidestep, stats

Dodge is the most important skill for vampires as I play them (and many "BB2016" vampire players agree), since you don't block that much, often you want to start your turn with an hypnogaze to blitz the right guy. This way you can dodge your vampire to do so before anything else without having to burn your rerolls on it.
And it gives your vampires as more sustainability than block, since ealry, few players in opposing teams have tacle. Blitzers don't need block early for me, since they already have juggernaut to prevent turnovers.


These skills and order of acquiring them sound correct based on Spookeh's reasoning. I am sure your old method for vamps can be applied to the current blitzers.

_________________
An Amorican Nuffler that bashed in his youth.
Gridironman



Joined: Mar 18, 2022

Post   Posted: Oct 24, 2023 - 22:24 Reply with quote Back to top

What I wonder is if my ball carrier suffers bloodlust BUT hands the ball off to a player already occupying a space in the end zone will that be a TD or a turnover? A non-bloodlust player would have rolled to catch and would have registered a score in my opinion prior to the bloodlust being accounted for as a turnover. According to the rules the turnover only involves the blood lusted character BUT it is the order of operations that matter here. For instance, would the handoff immediately incur a bloodlust turnover ending the drive before a catch can be accounted for prior to even registering a TD? That probably deserves an FAQ.

Note: Keep in mind that I am refraining from drinking blood with a vampire in this instance.

_________________
An Amorican Nuffler that bashed in his youth.
EinVoegleinImWind



Joined: May 31, 2023

Post   Posted: Oct 24, 2023 - 23:10 Reply with quote Back to top

Gridironman wrote:
What I wonder is if my ball carrier suffers bloodlust BUT hands the ball off to a player already occupying a space in the end zone will that be a TD or a turnover? A non-bloodlust player would have rolled to catch and would have registered a score in my opinion prior to the bloodlust being accounted for as a turnover. According to the rules the turnover only involves the blood lusted character BUT it is the order of operations that matter here. For instance, would the handoff immediately incur a bloodlust turnover ending the drive before a catch can be accounted for prior to even registering a TD? That probably deserves an FAQ.

Note: Keep in mind that I am refraining from drinking blood with a vampire in this instance.
It is a turnover since you need to bite before hand-offs or passes. The ball never reaches the player in the endzone.
Harpick



Joined: Oct 07, 2023

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 00:20 Reply with quote Back to top

Yes this is explicit in the rules. I'd just add that you still can try, 1/8 chance that when your vampire drop the ball, he does it on your target Very Happy
ClayInfinity



Joined: Aug 15, 2003

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 00:23 Reply with quote Back to top

And you have to declare the hand-off before the blood lust roll as well. You can't elect to hand off based on the Blood Lust roll.

You can elect to move rather than block but you can't elect to hand off or pass.
MrCushtie



Joined: Aug 10, 2018

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 00:37 Reply with quote Back to top

Malmir wrote:
Playing against vamps right now and their vamp failed bloodlust in turn 8 whilst carrying the ball. I assumed he'd need a dodge to make it to the endzone to be next to a thrall, but instead he went in the endzone and then walked another square in the endzone to get next to the thrall. Is that a bug? I think it either is a bug or is a rule fail. My oppo disagreed and neither of us were the slightest bit biased Smile


I think a bloodlusted vamp can't walk through the end zone to get to a thrall to bite. Last line of the Bloodlust rule: (my emphasis in bold)
"If a player who failed this roll wants to make a Pass action, Hand-off, or score then they must bite a Thrall before they perform the action or score."

and then page 64 of the rulebook:
"A touchdown is scored when a Standing player in possession of the ball enters a square that is within the opposing team's End Zone without Falling Over or being Knocked Down"

So it's:

If you enter the opposing team's end zone with the ball, a touchdown is scored, except if you have bloodlust and can't bite a thrall upon moving into the end zone. It's not "If you enter the opposing team's end zone with the ball and bloodlust, a touchdown is not scored until you have reached a thrall to bite them"

_________________
Image
Gridironman



Joined: Mar 18, 2022

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 00:45 Reply with quote Back to top

That answers my question then

_________________
An Amorican Nuffler that bashed in his youth.
Harpick



Joined: Oct 07, 2023

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 09:56 Reply with quote Back to top

MrCushtie wrote:

"If a player who failed this roll wants to make a Pass action, Hand-off, or score then they must bite a Thrall before they perform the action or score."

and then page 64 of the rulebook:
"A touchdown is scored when a Standing player in possession of the ball enters a square that is within the opposing team's End Zone without Falling Over or being Knocked Down"


Still, that doesn't explicitly says that crossing the endzone in that case end your action. An other understanding of the rules could be that you are not allowed in any case to cross the endzone with a bloodlusted vampire carrying the ball (this one is really farfetched).
TheGe



Joined: Mar 31, 2015

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 16:49 Reply with quote Back to top

Well, as the oponement of Malmir I could be biaised, but...
Regarding the fluff I do not see why the vamps could not go to the Thrall by the endzone.
The rule is here to state that if the vamp do not bite he throws the ball down so there is no TD scored. In my case he is able to bite so no throwing down of the ball ==> TD.
If you consider entering the endzone is an auto end of turn due to TD, then you should not resolve the bite...
Sp00keh



Joined: Dec 06, 2011

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 18:11 Reply with quote Back to top

Image

Image
Sp00keh



Joined: Dec 06, 2011

Post   Posted: Oct 25, 2023 - 18:16 Reply with quote Back to top

Harpick wrote:
Still, that doesn't explicitly says that crossing the endzone in that case end your action

I think it does...
TD is scored when "player in possession of the ball enters .. the end zone"
And then "As soon as a touchdown is scored, play stops"
So there should be no option to continue roaming around the EZ

1) The TD is scored
2) The Vamp is fixed into his current square as play stops
3) A turnover has happened
4) 2 and 3 both would mean the vamp's activation is over


However, Bloodlust rule says
After event 4) and without biting, "if the player was in the opposing End Zone, no touchdown is scored"

I think this means the TD is retrospectively undone
Then the vamp will drop the ball and cause a turnover, because it ended activation without biting
Which actually sounds fine

You could argue that events 2,3,4) should also be cancelled, but then we're in a paradox
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic