mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
 Posted:
Dec 08, 2016 - 23:28 |
 
|
|
licker
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2016 - 23:32 |
|
Just remember to burn all your extra cash hiring and firing cheerleaders to avoid the dreaded 'j-man abuse' rule.
Oh, look, there's EM to legitimize something else! |
|
|
Matthueycamo
Joined: May 16, 2014
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2016 - 23:47 |
|
| thoralf wrote: | | Matthueycamo wrote: | | Not taking that bloodweiser could cost you your entire treasury or half of it [...] |
Expensive Mistakes happens in the post-match sequence. The main thing that could cost you your entire treasury (1/6 with a 300-390K treasury) is not buying stuff before the EM sequence.
Since a keg is more than your winnings expectations for a game, all you need to maintain your treasury between 200 and 300 is to buy one keg or to buy stuff.
Buying stuff. What's wrong with that? |
Not sure how that relates even in the slightest to the thrust of my post? |
_________________
DLE College 7s |
|
licker
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2016 - 23:53 |
|
| Matthueycamo wrote: | | thoralf wrote: | | Matthueycamo wrote: | | Not taking that bloodweiser could cost you your entire treasury or half of it [...] |
Expensive Mistakes happens in the post-match sequence. The main thing that could cost you your entire treasury (1/6 with a 300-390K treasury) is not buying stuff before the EM sequence.
Since a keg is more than your winnings expectations for a game, all you need to maintain your treasury between 200 and 300 is to buy one keg or to buy stuff.
Buying stuff. What's wrong with that? |
Not sure how that relates even in the slightest to the thrust of my post? |
To be fair, I'm pretty sure that thoralf isn't sure either. |
|
|
Balle2000
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2016 - 23:58 |
|
| licker wrote: | | but you're not going to get too far with bad maths here. |
Nah, the point pretty much stands.
Pointing out that I used an approximation means nothing. This isn't a court of law or a maths contest.
You pointed it out ineffectively by the way. You could have just said "I see you are using an approximation". Would have saved you a post or two. |
|
|
mrt1212
Joined: Feb 26, 2013
|
| Posted:
Dec 08, 2016 - 23:59 |
|
| Balle2000 wrote: | | licker wrote: | | but you're not going to get too far with bad maths here. |
Nah, the point pretty much stands.
Pointing out that I used an approximation means nothing. This isn't a court of law or a maths contest.
You pointed it out ineffectively by the way. You could have just said "I see you are using an approximation". Would have saved you a post or two. |
Report to the Hague, chop chop. |
|
|
licker
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:03 |
|
| Balle2000 wrote: | | licker wrote: | | but you're not going to get too far with bad maths here. |
Nah, the point pretty much stands.
Pointing out that I used an approximation means nothing. This isn't a court of law or a maths contest.
You pointed it out ineffectively by the way. You could have just said "I see you are using an approximation". Would have saved you a post or two. |
I corrected you and gave you the information with which to make an accurate assessment of what cash earnings actually are.
I still don't know what point you were trying to make, nor what point you are trying to make now, other than that when there was an easy way to use a better approximation you chose to continue with a clearly incorrect one.
Like I said, that's great, but any point you are trying to make from that basis is going to be pretty irrelevant. |
|
|
Balle2000
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:04 |
|
| koadah wrote: | | The whole thread is in the context of R & B. |
To you maybe.
There are also posts about 1) this new dynamic, 2) new divisions, 3) implications for [L]eague.
Anyway, you seem to be basing your disgust for this new rule upon the higher range of arbitrary numbers people are throwing about here, and ignore that people suggest 8 or 10 game seasons. |
|
|
Balle2000
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:06 |
|
| licker wrote: | | I still don't know what point you were trying to make |
The post is still there if you flip back a couple of pages.
The numbers were correct enough for the purpose of making that point.
Give me a call when you figure it out. |
|
|
licker
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:10 |
|
I am aware of the post, you seem unaware of the critique of it which had nothing to do with correct or incorrect winnings.
But if you are trying to say that teams only earn 280k and that's not enough to worry about EM or spending any cash during the season.
Then, well, already covered that too. |
|
|
koadah
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:19 |
|
| Balle2000 wrote: | | koadah wrote: | | The whole thread is in the context of R & B. |
To you maybe.
There are also posts about 1) this new dynamic, 2) new divisions, 3) implications for [L]eague.
Anyway, you seem to be basing your disgust for this new rule upon the higher range of arbitrary numbers people are throwing about here, and ignore that people suggest 8 or 10 game seasons. |
It is still a ridiculous rule. Saying it won't happen often isn't much of a defense when it didn't have to happen at all. |
_________________
[SL] + Official Stunty teams. Progression KO. Old & new teams welcome. 29th May! |
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:31 |
|
What? Who? When?
We are discussing making new Open format Divisions to rival R/B?
 |
_________________
Comish of the:  |
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:34 |
|
| Balle2000 wrote: | | Anyway, you seem to be basing your disgust for this new rule upon the higher range of arbitrary numbers people are throwing about here, and ignore that people suggest 8 or 10 game seasons. |
Well, as I pointed out around 15 pages ago. This is the central point of contention when it comes to seasons.
Some want it 8-10.
Some want 16
Some want 20
Some want 25
Some want 18754
Some want to just ignore this one optional rule in R/B.
So
Have at it. |
_________________
Comish of the: |
|
Balle2000
Joined: Sep 25, 2008
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:43 |
|
IF there will be seasons in RnB, and that's a huge IF in itself, the number of games will - if Fumbbl history is anything to go by - be decide based on thorough calculations much like what was done for the rookie protection given in the Blackbox scheduler. IMO. |
|
|
PainState
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2016 - 00:46 |
|
| koadah wrote: | | The whole thread is in the context of R & B. |
Lets never forget one thing.
League will be able to disable and/or change how "season play" is implemented in each of the hundreds of leagues.
Ranked/Box..... It effects every single coach who plays in those two Divs. There is no way to move to another league to play under "seasons" that I like. You have to just suck it up and accept what the new mandate from on high is. |
_________________
Comish of the: |
|
|
|
Blood Bowl 2024 Edit...
Search
