| Poll |
| Is the diversity really that bad? |
| I don't play in the box but think - NO |
|
6% |
[ 9 ] |
| I don't play in the box but think - YES |
|
13% |
[ 20 ] |
| I've had less then 20 box games and think - NO |
|
8% |
[ 12 ] |
| I've had less then 20 box games and think - YES |
|
12% |
[ 18 ] |
| I've had less then 100 box games and think - NO |
|
19% |
[ 28 ] |
| I've had less then 100 box games and think - YES |
|
19% |
[ 28 ] |
| I've had more then 100 box games and think - NO |
|
21% |
[ 31 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 146 |
|
odi
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
 Posted:
Oct 22, 2009 - 13:20 |
 
|
Gobbos are missing! Not sure if there are any above TS200 though  |
|
|
Grod
Joined: Sep 30, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 22, 2009 - 13:25 |
|
Do you think this would be different in an LRB5 Blackbox, with aging removed, Journeymen, and where niggles are not so debilitating? Would an agility team last longer? |
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
Oscar Wilde |
|
Fela
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
|
| Posted:
Oct 22, 2009 - 13:43 |
|
| odi wrote: | | Gobbos are missing! Not sure if there are any above TS200 though |
Only races with teams above 149 TS are included. Go figure. |
|
|
Aldar
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
|
| Posted:
Oct 22, 2009 - 14:18 |
|
| Grod wrote: | | Do you think this would be different in an LRB5 Blackbox, with aging removed, Journeymen, and where niggles are not so debilitating? Would an agility team last longer? |
my oppinion is : yes!
with my skaven i just can´t keep a TR over 200 because i have to replace/retire players , keeping niggled linerats is no option here because they contribute to harder match ups |
|
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
| Posted:
Oct 22, 2009 - 14:22 |
|
Nice stats. Surprised undead are so under-represented in B. |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Oct 22, 2009 - 14:24 |
|
Nice data.
Just confirms the general feeling I had - at TS200+, Chaos, Khemri, Dwarves and Orcs make up 2/3 of the population.
And I don`t think, that agility teams have an easier time staying at high TV in LRB5. Worse apo and spiraling expenses cripple the teams then. Especially the apo is a major problems for teams with high TV low AV players (read wardancers). |
|
|
maysrill
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
|
| Posted:
Oct 22, 2009 - 14:39 |
|
| clarkin wrote: | | Nice stats. Surprised undead are so under-represented in B. |
Why limit yourself to just 2 mummies when people still have to play you?
I'll be curious to see the effects of SE on bashers. Obviously it's already harder keeping the ballers alive, but I wonder if bashers will also have noticeable trouble keeping big if that once-in-a-while death/crippling can't be replaced due to lack of funds. It's possible that it might level the field a bit by keeping the bashers low artificially (via SE) to where the ballers would end up more naturally (via getting the snot beaten out of them). |
|
|
Fela
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
|
| Posted:
Oct 23, 2009 - 00:20 |
|
I was surprised that CDs are so underrepresented (well, maybe not quite surprised since i so rarely play against them), I always considered them comparable to orcs flexibility-wise.
I also expected more dwarfs, about 10% seems almost tolerable considering more than half the teams they meet will be bashy enough to give them trouble. Less than the expected 20% dwarves also means playing blodge-heavy teams seems still viable even at high TS. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Blood Bowl 2024 Edit...
Search
