SillySod
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
|
 Posted:
Dec 03, 2009 - 17:13 |
 
|
| CircularLogic wrote: | | the least amount should be 3, else there would be too many ties. |
No, the easiest solution is to give the record to whoever got it first. A player being active isnt too much of a problem either - maybe it only needs updating when he dies or if the old record gets overtaken? |
_________________
Putting the "eh?" back into Sexeh.
"There are those to whom knowledge is a shield. There are those to whom it is a weapon. Neither view is balanced." |
|
XtremeXwing
Joined: Dec 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 03, 2009 - 18:16 |
|
What silly said 
did we also want to have a breakdown of race by winners? that would be cool. |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 03, 2009 - 18:24 |
|
You can do the Breakdown, and I link to your post in the OP. Or you start your own Tourney Stats thread. |
|
|
XtremeXwing
Joined: Dec 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 03, 2009 - 23:16 |
|
Fumbbl B Minors
Khremi 2
Dwarf 2
Chaos Dwarf 2
Human 2
Skaven 1
Dark Elves 1
Chaos 1
Undead 1
(1 Minor outstanding either Orc or Undead to be added)
Fumbbl B Majors
Dark Elves
The thing that i find quite odd is that no Orc's have won anything in the box yet. But yet this could be a sign! The [B]ox needs more orcs!!  |
|
|
Wreckage
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 04, 2009 - 00:18 |
|
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 04, 2009 - 01:36 |
|
If you are making any new catoegories, you could put my Norse down, for the number of games before being defeated \o/ |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 04, 2009 - 08:01 |
|
Everything updated. And no - streaks starting from the debutmatch are just the same as those starting later. Most tourney titles held is worth a category though I`d say. |
|
|
clarkin
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 04, 2009 - 10:30 |
|
First come first served I say. Red vs Blue should claim the record now and when (if) someone wins 3 with the same team they can take it over.
edit: whoops, missed this last page of replies  |
|
|
DukeTyrion
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 04, 2009 - 11:04 |
|
| CircularLogic wrote: | | And no - streaks starting from the debutmatch are just the same as those starting later. |
I don't agree with that, but then, it's not my selection of awards.  |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 04, 2009 - 18:09 |
|
I`m open to discussion, but I rather don`t want to split up records into subrecords just so that it`s easier to archive. If you claim an extra position for streaks starting the debut match, then how can I deny a record for a streak starting with a drop in TR of 50+ or starting with a match against flings. |
|
|
XtremeXwing
Joined: Dec 03, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 04, 2009 - 19:16 |
|
i quite like stats and dont mind either way tbh, although having a norse, dwarf or cd team win from the start is quite easy. Play norse at tr 200 and try and win 19 games in a row then . Like i said i am up for both |
|
|
asharak
Joined: Nov 27, 2007
|
| Posted:
Dec 09, 2009 - 15:44 |
|
Eeek, 19 wins in a row to beat? That'll be tough! |
_________________
Give a man a fire and he will be warm for the rest of the day.
Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life. |
|
Raasted
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 11, 2009 - 20:17 |
|
Is the 7/0/0 record still the one to beat in that area? |
|
|
CircularLogic
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
|
| Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 16:04 |
|
The Complementary Bashers come today after their 50th victory to claim the record for the least games needed to archieve this feat in the box. With a record of 50/11/13 they finally made it and are coming back into shape after what was a horrible run following the narrow and unlucky defeat in the Black Cup. On towards the 100 wins! |
|
|
hermano_p
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
|
| Posted:
Dec 28, 2009 - 02:44 |
|
Least games to 200 wins CURIOSETES with 444 games. |
|
|
|
|
Blood Bowl 2024 Edit...
Search
