23 coaches online • Server time: 11:51
Forum Chat
Log in
Recent Forum Topics goto Post Blood Bowl 2024 Edit...goto Post SWL Season CIgoto Post NBFL Season 32: The ...
SearchSearch 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Poll
Would you allow backward redeclaration of actions?
I like the UNDO option
4%
 4%  [ 8 ]
I like the petitioning
3%
 3%  [ 5 ]
I've got a better idea (and will post it below)
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
NO!
87%
 87%  [ 144 ]
Pie!
4%
 4%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 165


Fela



Joined: Dec 27, 2004

Post   Posted: Sep 13, 2010 - 13:33 Reply with quote Back to top

nin wrote:
I voted "NO"
Why? well, there is a poll and it's the option closer to my oppinion.
If it's going to be ignored, then I don't see the needfor the poll.


Why ignored?
I tried to explain earlier that by that time i mainly tried to find out why people voted 'no' besides the - not very happy - reasons i could offhand come up with.

nin wrote:
For example "undo as far as no rolls has been made" can lead to easy abuse. You take "move" and get into a DT tackle zone and then you notice the skill and instead of dodging you switch to "blitz". Same goes for Prehensile Tail, Tentackles, Pass Block and miscounted assists in a "blitz" (that you could turn into a "move")


This is actually a very good and valid loophole and something i admit freely to not having considered.

Kudos for being the first to come up with a real argument instead of 'I don't like it, because I don't like rule adaptions'.

nin wrote:
Edit: I see flames and trolling... may be I regret posting in such a thread


There have been worse threads IMO. This one is mostly dead now anyway - I would have let it rest too, if your post hadn't been good enough to deserve some response. Smile
Display posts from previous:     
 Jump to:   
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic