benjysmyth
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
|
 Posted:
Aug 01, 2008 - 23:50 |
 
|
I think I remember reading somewhere that it is a good idea to keep a niggled bestman on a Rotters team as since you have no apoc you need every man you can get for financial reasons, and you therefore just put him on the LOS until they die.
Do people agree with this, or should I just fire him? He has failed to turn up for both games since he niggled as well so seems to be a bit of a liability anyhow. I'm thinking dropping him from my team http://fumbbl.com/FUMBBL.php?page=team&op=view&team_id=482194 would also get my TR below 125 and so lead to a bit more money next game to go towards another Rottter and the beastman's replacement. |
|
|
johan
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
|
| Posted:
Aug 02, 2008 - 00:15 |
|
I'd fire him. It takes you under a winnings tier. |
_________________
”It's very sad
To see the ancient and distinguished game that used to be
A model of decorum and tranquillity
Become like any other sport, a battleground...”
—Benny Andersson & Björn Ulvaeus, Chess |
|
Faust
Joined: Apr 07, 2008
|
| Posted:
Aug 02, 2008 - 00:27 |
|
Since the Beastman has no Skill i agree with to fire him |
|
|
PorkusMaximus
Joined: May 19, 2008
|
| Posted:
Aug 03, 2008 - 00:06 |
|
Haha, did someone take offence at the team image?  |
|
|
benjysmyth
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
|
 Posted:
Aug 03, 2008 - 00:16 |
|
|
RNG speculations
Search
